26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) – Main Works Contracts
Value
€850.0m
Deadline
15 May
15 May 2026
Value
€850.0m
Deadline
15 May
Main works contracts for Greater Dublin Drainage project by Uisce Éireann.
Main works contracts for Greater Dublin Drainage project by Uisce Éireann.
Bidder profile
Mid-sized to large firms with experience in public sector tenders and operational capabilities in drainage services.
Risks & flags
- High turnover requirement
- Two-step qualification process
- Ambiguity in ITT details
Briefing
AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.
1. At a glance
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Uisce Éireann |
| Title | 26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) – Main Works Contracts |
| CPV / category | works |
| Estimated value | 850000000.00 |
| Per-year (if multi-year) | not stated |
| Procedure type | not stated |
| Lots | not stated |
| Location | Ireland |
| Contract length | 2 years |
| Submission deadline | 2026-05-15T11:00:00+00:00 |
| Go-live / start | not stated |
2. Scope of Work
Uisce Éireann ran this procurement for “26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) – Main Works Contracts” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:
- Core service configuration, integration, and ongoing support obligations were referenced but not numerically defined in the extract.
- ITT-stage documents were expected to carry the granular technical schedules, acceptance tests, and phased rollout details.
- The bidder had to evidence ability to mobilise, operate, and maintain the contracted service profile for the full term. Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.
3. Background & buyer context
The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.
- Example: Health &Safery Policy Sep 2025.doc becomes H_S_Policy_25
- Example: Health &Safery Policy Sep 2025.doc becomes H_S_Policy_25.doc
4. Eligibility & selection criteria
- Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
- Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
- Certifications — not specified for this tender
- Past experience — not specified for this tender
- Personnel — not specified for this tender
- Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
- — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
- gn & Build (DB) Main Works 2 Design & Build (DB) Main Works 3 DBO Form of Contract NEC4 ECC Target Cost NEC4 ECC Target Cost FIDIC Gold/NEC4 DBO Turnover Requirement €100m* €100m* €175m* Indexation Provision Yes Yes Yes Expe
5. Award criteria & scoring
| Criterion | Weight (%) | Sub-criteria | Pass/fail threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | not stated | Methodology / implementation detail not stated in extract | not stated |
| Price | not stated | Pricing basis not stated in extract | not stated |
| The documents indicated a staged process (qualification, then tender). Any explicit MEAT split is captured above where a numeric line was visible; otherwise it remained not specified in the provided text extract. |
6. Submission requirements
- Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — not specified in extract.
- CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
- Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
- Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
- Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
- Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
- Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
- APPENDIX 9: Minimum REQUIREMENTS: Relevant Experience (D2) 55
- they intend to rely on the financial capacity of another entity to satisfy this Minimum Requirement they must submit all of the following: 1
- D2 Relevant Experience (Pass/ Fail) The minimum requirements relevant to each Lot are outlined in Appendix 9 with respect to Previous Project Experience
- o tender (provided four Applicants submit compliant PQQ Responses that meet the minimum requirements)
- These minimum requirements may be met collectively across the submitted reference projects
- according to the relevant section, the relevant appendix number and a descriptive name
7. Key dates & process
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| RFT issued | not specified |
| Clarification deadline | not specified |
| Mandatory site visit | not specified |
| Tender deadline (date + time) | 2026-05-15T11:00:00+00:00 |
| Expected award | not specified |
| Contract start | not specified |
| Go-live / mobilisation | not stated |
| Date surfaced in documents | 2026-05-15T11:00:00+00:00 |
| Date surfaced in documents | 1 August 2024 |
| Date surfaced in documents | August 2024 |
| Date surfaced in documents | Sep 2025 |
8. Contract terms that matter
Contract duration in the extract: 2 years. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.
- VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
- according to the relevant section, the relevant appendix number and a descriptive name
- relevant section, the relevant appendix number and a descriptive name
- [26-003 Tender Pack - PQQ.zip] [ZIP containing 3 files]
9. Risks, red flags & unusuals
- Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
- The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
- Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.
10. SME fit assessment
This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.
- Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
- Consortium / sub-contracting — not clearly specified in extract.
- Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
- Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.
11. Where to dig deeper
- Source RFT/PQQ filenames: Notes_for_submission.pdf, APPENDIX 9: Minimum REQUIREMENTS: Relevant Experience (D2) 55](#_Toc222815772), Appendix 9 with respect to Previous Project Experience.
- eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
- Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
- Key attachments to prioritise: PQQ Responses that meet the minimum requirements), PQQ Response, appendix number and a descriptive name.
Can you bid?
Required certifications
- ISO 27001 (or equivalent cyber security standard)
Minimum turnover
€100,000,000
Scoring
Most Economically Advantageous Tender
Technical Merit
Social Value
Price
Lots (3)
Drainage infrastructure works in urban areas
Drainage infrastructure works near protected or ecologically sensitive sites
Drainage infrastructure works involving deep excavations, lifting activities, and working at height
Documents (9)
26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ Final v2 markups.pdf
803.1 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate
26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ Final v2.docx
280.3 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate
26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ Final.docx
282.3 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate
Notes_for_submission.pdf
194.6 KB · Other
26-003 Appendix_4 GDD PQQ.xlsx
94.3 KB · Appendix / Annex
26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ App 4 Final.xlsx
93.9 KB
26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ App 7 Final.pdf
2.1 MB
GDD Dirn OF Travel Clarification.pdf
97.7 KB · Clarification / Addendum
Tender Clarification Request Form - eTender.xlsx
52.5 KB · Clarification / Addendum
Original notice text
The Contracting Entity intends to undertake a competitive tendering process, the objective of which is to appoint suitable Works Contractors to deliver the Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) project. The project is divided into the following lots: Lot 1 - Orbital Sewers (MW 1), Lot 2 - Outfall Pipeline (MW 2) and Lot 3 - Wastewater Treatment Plant (MW 3). Full details are contained in the attached procurement documents.
AI analysis updated 4 months ago
Value
€850.0m
Deadline
15 May
Buyer
Uisce ÉireannLocation
Ireland
Procedure
Negotiated
Clarification
08 May 2026
eTenders ID
7445540
Ask AI
Knows this tender's documents
Example only — sign up to ask about this tender