Skip to content
TenderMatch
The recorded submission deadline has passed. Find open opportunities. Check the official notice for amendments.
← Tenders / 26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) – Main Works Contracts
Closed Construction & Civil Engineering Works Negotiated

26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) – Main Works Contracts

Value

€850.0m

Deadline

15 May

Main works contracts for Greater Dublin Drainage project by Uisce Éireann.

SME fit: Medium Bid effort: Medium 📍 Dublin

Main works contracts for Greater Dublin Drainage project by Uisce Éireann.

Bidder profile

Mid-sized to large firms with experience in public sector tenders and operational capabilities in drainage services.

Risks & flags

  • High turnover requirement
  • Two-step qualification process
  • Ambiguity in ITT details

Briefing

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

Field Detail
Buyer Uisce Éireann
Title 26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) – Main Works Contracts
CPV / category works
Estimated value 850000000.00
Per-year (if multi-year) not stated
Procedure type not stated
Lots not stated
Location Ireland
Contract length 2 years
Submission deadline 2026-05-15T11:00:00+00:00
Go-live / start not stated

2. Scope of Work

Uisce Éireann ran this procurement for “26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) – Main Works Contracts” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

  • Core service configuration, integration, and ongoing support obligations were referenced but not numerically defined in the extract.
  • ITT-stage documents were expected to carry the granular technical schedules, acceptance tests, and phased rollout details.
  • The bidder had to evidence ability to mobilise, operate, and maintain the contracted service profile for the full term. Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

  • Example: Health &Safery Policy Sep 2025.doc becomes H_S_Policy_25
  • Example: Health &Safery Policy Sep 2025.doc becomes H_S_Policy_25.doc

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

  • Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
  • Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
  • Certifications — not specified for this tender
  • Past experience — not specified for this tender
  • Personnel — not specified for this tender
  • Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
  • — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
  • gn & Build (DB) Main Works 2 Design & Build (DB) Main Works 3 DBO Form of Contract NEC4 ECC Target Cost NEC4 ECC Target Cost FIDIC Gold/NEC4 DBO Turnover Requirement €100m* €100m* €175m* Indexation Provision Yes Yes Yes Expe

5. Award criteria & scoring

Criterion Weight (%) Sub-criteria Pass/fail threshold
Quality not stated Methodology / implementation detail not stated in extract not stated
Price not stated Pricing basis not stated in extract not stated
The documents indicated a staged process (qualification, then tender). Any explicit MEAT split is captured above where a numeric line was visible; otherwise it remained not specified in the provided text extract.

6. Submission requirements

  • Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — not specified in extract.
  • CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
  • Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
  • Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
  • Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
  • Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
  • Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
  • APPENDIX 9: Minimum REQUIREMENTS: Relevant Experience (D2) 55
  • they intend to rely on the financial capacity of another entity to satisfy this Minimum Requirement they must submit all of the following: 1
  • D2 Relevant Experience (Pass/ Fail) The minimum requirements relevant to each Lot are outlined in Appendix 9 with respect to Previous Project Experience
  • o tender (provided four Applicants submit compliant PQQ Responses that meet the minimum requirements)
  • These minimum requirements may be met collectively across the submitted reference projects
  • according to the relevant section, the relevant appendix number and a descriptive name

7. Key dates & process

Milestone Date
RFT issued not specified
Clarification deadline not specified
Mandatory site visit not specified
Tender deadline (date + time) 2026-05-15T11:00:00+00:00
Expected award not specified
Contract start not specified
Go-live / mobilisation not stated
Date surfaced in documents 2026-05-15T11:00:00+00:00
Date surfaced in documents 1 August 2024
Date surfaced in documents August 2024
Date surfaced in documents Sep 2025

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 2 years. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

  • VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
  • according to the relevant section, the relevant appendix number and a descriptive name
  • relevant section, the relevant appendix number and a descriptive name
  • [26-003 Tender Pack - PQQ.zip] [ZIP containing 3 files]

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

  • Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
  • The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
  • Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

  • Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
  • Consortium / sub-contracting — not clearly specified in extract.
  • Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
  • Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

  • Source RFT/PQQ filenames: Notes_for_submission.pdf, APPENDIX 9: Minimum REQUIREMENTS: Relevant Experience (D2) 55](#_Toc222815772), Appendix 9 with respect to Previous Project Experience.
  • eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
  • Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
  • Key attachments to prioritise: PQQ Responses that meet the minimum requirements), PQQ Response, appendix number and a descriptive name.

Can you bid?

Required certifications

  • ISO 27001 (or equivalent cyber security standard)

Minimum turnover

€100,000,000

Scoring

Most Economically Advantageous Tender

Technical Merit

Social Value

Price

Lots (3)

Lot 1: Lot 1

Drainage infrastructure works in urban areas

Lot 2: Lot 2

Drainage infrastructure works near protected or ecologically sensitive sites

Lot 3: Lot 3

Drainage infrastructure works involving deep excavations, lifting activities, and working at height

Documents (9)

PDF

26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ Final v2 markups.pdf

803.1 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ Final v2.docx

280.3 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ Final.docx

282.3 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

PDF

Notes_for_submission.pdf

194.6 KB · Other

XLSX

26-003 Appendix_4 GDD PQQ.xlsx

94.3 KB · Appendix / Annex

XLSX

26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ App 4 Final.xlsx

93.9 KB

PDF

26-003 Greater Dublin Drainage PQQ App 7 Final.pdf

2.1 MB

PDF

GDD Dirn OF Travel Clarification.pdf

97.7 KB · Clarification / Addendum

XLSX

Tender Clarification Request Form - eTender.xlsx

52.5 KB · Clarification / Addendum

Original notice text

The Contracting Entity intends to undertake a competitive tendering process, the objective of which is to appoint suitable Works Contractors to deliver the Greater Dublin Drainage (GDD) project. The project is divided into the following lots: Lot 1 - Orbital Sewers (MW 1), Lot 2 - Outfall Pipeline (MW 2) and Lot 3 - Wastewater Treatment Plant (MW 3). Full details are contained in the attached procurement documents.

AI analysis updated 4 months ago

Bid ↗
Details

Value

€850.0m

Deadline

15 May

View on eTenders ↗

Location

Ireland

Procedure

Negotiated

Clarification

08 May 2026

eTenders ID

7445540

✦ Ask AI about this tender

Ask AI

Knows this tender's documents

Is this a good fit for us?
Based on the deadline, buyer, and eligibility requirements in the tender documents, here's a quick read on fit — with citations back to the exact clause 1 so you can verify it yourself.

Example only — sign up to ask about this tender