Refurbishment, Renovation and Extension of the Existing Connolly Barracks, Church Street, Abbeycartron, Longford
Value
€5.1m
Deadline
23 Apr
23 Apr 2026
Value
€5.1m
Deadline
23 Apr
Refurbishment and extension of Connolly Barracks in Longford
Refurbishment and extension of Connolly Barracks in Longford
Bidder profile
This opportunity is suitable for SMEs or mid-market contractors with strong compliance and execution capabilities.
Risks & flags
- Strict compliance requirements
- Insurance thresholds
- Submission deadline risks
Briefing
AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.
1. At a glance
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Longford County Council |
| Title | Refurbishment, Renovation and Extension of the Existing Connolly Barracks, Church Street, Abbeycartron, Longford |
| CPV / category | works |
| Estimated value | €5,100,000.00 |
| Per-year (if multi-year) | not stated |
| Procedure type | not stated |
| Lots | not stated |
| Location | not stated |
| Contract length | not stated |
| Submission deadline | 2026-04-23T15:00:00+00:00 |
| Go-live / start | not stated |
2. Scope of Work
The contracting authority sought works under the title "Refurbishment, Renovation and Extension of the Existing Connolly Barracks, Church Street, Abbeycartron, Longford" for Longford County Council. The extracted text pointed to a defined scope with mandatory obligations, programme interfaces, and compliance-led execution constraints. Operational activity included mobilisation, method planning, delivery sequencing, quality control, and handover obligations tied to contract conditions. The source wording repeatedly used mandatory language, which indicated that bidders had to evidence capability rather than provide high-level intent. Key quantified references in the extract included €6.5, €6,500,000, €13,000,000, €1,500,000, 2%, €5,000, €5,, 12 years.
0 6J The contractor shall employ a consulting engineer with Professional Indemnity Insurance of €6.5m to prepare their temporary works propos. 0 19D Minimum indemnity limit for Public liability insurance: €6,500,000 for any one event. 0 19E Minimum indemnity limit for Employers liability insurance: €13,000,000 for any one event. 0 19J Minimum indemnity limit for Professional Indemnity insurance: €1,500,000 annual aggregate limit, kept in place fo. 0 19L Maximum excess for Professional Indemnity insurance: 2% of annual turnover or €5,000 whichever is greater 1. 0 19L Maximum excess for Professional Indemnity insurance: 2% of annual turnover or €5, Risks policy must note Longford County C.
3. Background & buyer context
The process was run by Longford County Council with deadline recorded as 2026-04-23T15:00:00+00:00. Procedure details were stated as not stated and lot structure as not stated. Contract period was stated as not stated with start/go-live marked not stated. The timeline required bidders to align submission content, evidence packs, and declarations to strict procurement sequencing. Any missing dates in extracts should be treated as pending clarification rather than optional.
4. Eligibility & selection criteria
Selection evidence focused on technical capacity, legal standing, and economic/financial sufficiency against mandatory thresholds. Insurance and indemnity references appeared in the verified text and should be treated as compliance gates at selection stage. Bid teams should map each mandatory phrase to objective evidence in the response index. Examples in extract included: 0 6J The contractor shall employ a consulting engineer with Professional Indemnity Insurance of €6.5m to prepare their temporary works propos; 0 19D Minimum indemnity limit for Public liability insurance: €6,500,000 for any one event; 0 19E Minimum indemnity limit for Employers liability insurance: €13,000,000 for any one event; 0 19J Minimum indemnity limit for Professional Indemnity insurance: €1,500,000 annual aggregate limit, kept in place fo; 0 19L Maximum excess for Professional Indemnity insurance: 2% of annual turnover or €5,000 whichever is greater 1. Any criterion stated with must/shall language should be assumed pass/fail unless the RFT explicitly describes scored treatment.
5. Award criteria & scoring
Evaluation was expected to follow MEAT-style scoring with weighted quality and price components unless otherwise stated in tender schedules. Quality marks typically depended on method, risk control, programme realism, governance, and relevant delivery track record. Price submission needed arithmetic consistency with bill/rate schedules and full compliance with format instructions. Clarification risk increased where responses omitted direct mapping from requirement text to evidence. Bidders should prioritise score-driving narratives only where criteria confirmed comparative marking.
6. Submission requirements
Delivery model expectations in the extracted material pointed to planned mobilisation, controlled execution, and measurable acceptance milestones. Outputs had to match specification wording, drawings/schedules where applicable, and authority approval checkpoints. Programme control, interface management, and issue escalation routes should be explicit in the bidder methodology. Acceptance should be evidenced through inspection records, compliance certificates, and closeout documentation as required by contract documents. Any dependency on third parties, utilities, or permits should be shown as dated assumptions with mitigation pathways.
7. Key dates & process
Commercial baseline in metadata showed estimated value €5,100,000.00. Pricing mechanics in public tenders usually required fixed-format submissions, exclusions discipline, and tax clarity. Bidders should validate indexation, provisional sums, option pricing, and variation treatment before final submission. Cashflow profile, milestone triggers, and retention/security positions should be checked against conditions and appendices. Where value fields were absent or symbolic, competition strategy should be based on scope intensity and risk transfer level.
8. Contract terms that matter
Legal and risk obligations in the extract referenced indemnity/insurance language and operational compliance obligations. Core controls should include H&S compliance, statutory licensing, data/security duties where relevant, and records retention. Contractual risk allocation likely covered delay, defects, liability caps/exclusions, and termination events; these need legal review. Quoted risk-relevant references included 0 6J The contractor shall employ a consulting engineer with Professional Indemnity Insurance of €6.5m to prepare their temporary works propos; 0 19D Minimum indemnity limit for Public liability insurance: €6,500,000 for any one event; 0 19E Minimum indemnity limit for Employers liability insurance: €13,000,000 for any one event; 0 19J Minimum indemnity limit for Professional Indemnity insurance: €1,500,000 annual aggregate limit, kept in place fo; 0 19L Maximum excess for Professional Indemnity insurance: 2% of annual turnover or €5,000 whichever is greater 1; 0 19L Maximum excess for Professional Indemnity insurance: 2% of annual turnover or €5, Risks policy must note Longford County C. No submission should proceed with unresolved redlines on non-negotiable risk positions.
9. Risks, red flags & unusuals
Process discipline should center on portal deadlines, clarification cut-off control, and version-managed response packs. Clarification questions should target missing thresholds, ambiguous acceptance tests, and any conflicting schedule references. A compliant submission pack usually includes signed forms, declarations, technical method statements, pricing schedules, and insurances. With deadline at 2026-04-23T15:00:00+00:00, internal freeze points should be set before portal close to absorb upload and validation risk. Any post-submission communication should follow the authority channel rules exactly.
10. SME fit assessment
- Build a requirement-by-requirement compliance matrix from the RFT and map each row to objective evidence.
- Confirm all pass/fail gates first (legal entity, insurances, financial standing, declarations, mandatory forms).
- Lock technical method narrative to the scored criteria language and remove non-scoring text.
- Reconcile pricing schedules, totals, assumptions, and signatures across every commercial form.
- Submit early on the portal and retain timestamped proof of upload and final file set.
11. Where to dig deeper
This opportunity suited a delivery-capable SME or lower-mid-market contractor with strong compliance execution and disciplined bid management. Bid/no-bid should turn on pass/fail certainty, resource availability to mobilise on authority timescales, and acceptable contractual risk. If mandatory insurance/financial thresholds cannot be met directly, consortium or structured subcontracting options should be evaluated before committing bid cost. For firms already active in comparable Irish public contracts, this looked like a viable competitive pursuit with tight execution discipline. Tender reference: 069cd72c-e337-7a48-8000-e732ec4d44a8.
Can you bid?
Required certifications
- Professional Indemnity Insurance
- Public Liability Insurance
- Employers Liability Insurance
Public liability insurance
€6,500,000
Professional indemnity insurance
€1,500,000
Scoring
Most Economically Advantageous Tender
Lots (1)
Refurbishment and renovation of the protected H-plan barracks building, including extensions and upgrades to provide social, community, and technological facilities.
Documents (76)
Tender Document Update 28 Jan 2026.zip
1.3 MB · Pricing / BOQ / Schedule of Rates
Tender Document Update 09 Feb 2026.zip
198.5 KB · Other
Tender Document Update 28 Jan 2026 - Part 2.zip
1.0 MB · Other
241056-MPA-X-X-X-L00-DR-SE-0101 - Proposed Ground Floor Layout-Rev 01.pdf
892.0 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-L01-DR-SE-0102 - Proposed First Floor Layout-Rev 01.pdf
1.1 MB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-L02-DR-SE-0103 - Proposed Second Floor Layout-Rev 01.pdf
552.0 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-CE-0101 - Proposed Site Layout-Rev 01.pdf
1.2 MB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-CE-0140- Proposed Underslab Drainage Layout-Rev 01.pdf
323.7 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-CE-0305 - Proposed External Works Details- Rev 01.pdf
1.1 MB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-CE-0306 - Proposed External Works Details Sheet 2- Rev 01.pdf
352.6 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-SE-0200 - Proposed Section 01-Rev 01.pdf
468.2 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-SE-0202 - Proposed Section 03-Rev 01.pdf
506.1 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-SE-0203 - Proposed Section 04-Rev 01.pdf
532.3 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-SE-0204 - Proposed Section 05-Rev 01.pdf
490.4 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-SE-0300 - Proposed structural Details Sheet 1 - Rev 01.pdf
323.6 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-SE-0301 - Proposed structural Details Sheet 2 - Rev 01.pdf
303.4 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-DR-SE-0302 - Proposed structural Details Sheet 3 - Rev 01.pdf
322.0 KB
241056-MPA-X-X-X-XXX-IS-CE-1000 - Tender Issue Register - 260320.pdf
185.5 KB
24214 Electrical Drawing Register.pdf
376.6 KB
24214-DW-FF-M-100-400.pdf
969.4 KB
24214-DW-SF-M-100-400.pdf
383.3 KB
24214-L00-DR-DLW-E-100.pdf
995.8 KB
24214-L00-DR-DLW-E-200.pdf
920.6 KB
24214-L01-DR-DLW-E-101.pdf
855.7 KB
24214-L01-DR-DLW-E-201.pdf
919.5 KB
24214-XXX-SH-DLW-M-0001 -Equipment Schedule (Connolly Barracks) - T02.pdf
495.2 KB
Connolly Barracks_Drawing Issue Register.pdf
41.0 KB
D.110_Level 00_Proposed.pdf
694.0 KB
D.300_Section AA South Wing_Proposed.pdf
351.8 KB
D.301_Section BB South Wing_Proposed.pdf
349.8 KB
D.302_Section CC North Wing_Proposed.pdf
351.5 KB
D.303_Section DD North Wing_Proposed.pdf
349.8 KB
D.304_Section EE South Stair.pdf
385.7 KB
D.305_Section FF South Central_Proposed.pdf
369.2 KB
D.306_Section GG Central_Proposed.pdf
394.6 KB
D.307_Section HH Central Stair_Proposed.pdf
392.3 KB
D.308_Section II Central Lift_Proposed.pdf
401.0 KB
D.309_Section JJ North Central_Proposed.pdf
368.5 KB
D.310_Section KK North Stair_Proposed.pdf
381.0 KB
D.311_Section LL Annexe South_Proposed.pdf
339.5 KB
D.312_Section MM Annexe Centre_Proposed.pdf
345.9 KB
D.313_Section NN Annexe North_Proposed.pdf
339.1 KB
D.400_Wall Detail_01.pdf
276.7 KB
D.401_Wall Detail_02.pdf
276.7 KB
D.402.1_Wall Detail_03.pdf
280.2 KB
D.402.2_Wall Detail_03.pdf
280.4 KB
D.402.3_Wall Detail_03.pdf
281.6 KB
D.421_Floor Detail_02.pdf
282.6 KB
D.427_Floor Detail_08.pdf
277.9 KB
D.430_Ceiling Details_01.pdf
281.2 KB
D.432_Ceiling Details_03.pdf
281.1 KB
D.441_Pitched Roof Replacement Detail.pdf
326.5 KB
D.442_Flat Roof.pdf
282.1 KB
D.447_Flat Roof Soffit.pdf
288.4 KB
D.460_Window Reveal.pdf
279.8 KB
D.471.A_Ramp Wall Details.pdf
289.0 KB
D.471.B_Ramp Wall Details.pdf
289.3 KB
D.472_Planter Details.pdf
288.7 KB
D.500_Front Landscape.pdf
334.3 KB
D.501_Planters.pdf
373.6 KB
D.502.A_Southern Ramp.pdf
391.4 KB
D.502.B_Northern Ramps.pdf
388.8 KB
D.503_Rear Landscape.pdf
501.9 KB
D.600_00_South.pdf
520.7 KB
D.601_00_North.pdf
468.2 KB
D.602_01_South.pdf
381.6 KB
D.603_01_North.pdf
393.1 KB
D.660_Main Hall Extension.pdf
492.3 KB
D.701_Internal Door Schedule.pdf
332.3 KB
D.711_Timber Panels Schedule.pdf
297.4 KB
D.712_Aluminium Panels Schedule.pdf
296.0 KB
Existing Building SOC.pdf
68.0 KB
External Works SOC.pdf
43.4 KB
New Building SOC.pdf
54.7 KB
W1308 - Connolly Addendum Vol C.CBX
1020.0 KB
W1308 - Connolly Barracks Vol C.xlsx
657.7 KB
Original notice text
This project involves the refurbishment, renovation, and extension of the existing Connolly Barracks, requiring compliance with strict procurement and execution standards.
AI analysis updated 4 months ago
Value
€5.1m
Deadline
23 Apr
Buyer
Longford County CouncilLocation
Connolly Barracks, Church Street, Abbeycartron, Longford
Procedure
Open
Clarification
23 Apr 2026
eTenders ID
7336242
Ask AI
Knows this tender's documents
Example only — sign up to ask about this tender