Skip to content
TenderMatch
The recorded submission deadline has passed. Find open opportunities. Check the official notice for amendments.
← Tenders / Request for Tenders for the provision of an Evaluation of the Children’s Court Advocate Pilot Project Services
Awarded Professional Consultancy Services SME Suitable Open

Request for Tenders for the provision of an Evaluation of the Children’s Court Advocate Pilot Project Services

Value

€250k

Deadline

04 Feb

Evaluation of the Children’s Court Advocate Pilot Project Services for the Department of Justice

SME fit: Medium Bid effort: Medium

Evaluation of the Children’s Court Advocate Pilot Project Services for the Department of Justice

Bidder profile

Mid-sized to large firms with public-sector tender experience and operational capability in evaluation services.

Risks & flags

  • Qualification gate
  • Two-step process
  • Ambiguity in ITT requirements

Briefing

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

Field Detail
Buyer Department of Justice Home Affairs and Migration
Title Request for Tenders for the provision of an Evaluation of the Children’s Court Advocate Pilot Project Services
CPV / category services
Estimated value 250000.00
Per-year (if multi-year) not stated
Procedure type not stated
Lots not stated
Location Ireland
Contract length 3 months
Submission deadline 2026-02-04T17:00:00+00:00
Go-live / start not stated

2. Scope of Work

Department of Justice Home Affairs and Migration ran this procurement for “Request for Tenders for the provision of an Evaluation of the Children’s Court Advocate Pilot Project Services” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

  • Title: Request for Tenders for the provision of an Evaluation of the Children’s Court Advocate Pilot Project Services
  • Buyer: Department of Justice Home Affairs and Migration
  • e successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13 million Public Liability €6.5 million Product Liability [not used] Profess
  • the proposed Services Contracts may amount to some €3,800,000 (excl
  • ority estimates that the expenditure on the Services to be covered by the proposed Services Contract may amount to some €250,000 (excl
  • rer shall be required to supply its Tax Clearance Access Number and Tax Reference Number to facilitate online verification of their tax status by
  • [2025_08_08_DOJ_CCA_Pilot Final.pdf] ServicesRFT160125
  • The Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration (the “Contracting Authority”)
  • (“Tenderers”) for the provision of the services as described in Appendix 1 to this RFT (the
  • In summary, the Services comprise: The Children’s Court Advocate (“CCA”) pilot seeks to
  • proceedings. The aim is to ensure children are supported with clear, accessible
  • Create a structured and supported mechanism through which the child’s views Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

  • The pilot will focus on the following objectives:
  • objectives of the pilot. The successful tenderer will be required to demonstrate the ability
  • Contracting Authority policy seeks to encourage participation on a fair and equal basis by

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

  • Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
  • Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.; e successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13 million Public Liability €6.5 million Product Liability [not used] Profess
  • Certifications — not specified for this tender
  • Past experience — not specified for this tender
  • Personnel — not specified for this tender
  • Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
  • — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
  • e successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13 million Public Liability €6.5 million Product Liability [not used] Profess

5. Award criteria & scoring

Criterion Weight (%) Sub-criteria Pass/fail threshold
Quality not stated Methodology / implementation detail not stated in extract not stated
Price not stated Pricing basis not stated in extract not stated
The documents indicated a staged process (qualification, then tender). Any explicit MEAT split is captured above where a numeric line was visible; otherwise it remained not specified in the provided text extract.

6. Submission requirements

  • Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — not specified in extract.
  • CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
  • Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
  • Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
  • Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
  • Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
  • Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
  • €200,000 and €999,000 in the last three (3) years preceding the declaration
  • €1,000,000 and €3,999,000 in the last three (3) years preceding the declaration
  • €3,999,000 in the last three (3) years preceding the declaration, to include all non-notif
  • Appendix 3A: Schedule C – Declaration of non-notifiable foreign financial contributions (valued between €200,000 and €999,000 in the last three years preceding the declaration)
  • 2022/2560 and where the notifying party has been in receipt of foreign financial contributions which are valued between €200,000 and €999,000 in the last three (3) years preceding the declaration
  • For reporting of foreign financial contributions which are of a value between €200,000 and €999,000 in the last three (3) years preceding the declaration

7. Key dates & process

Milestone Date
RFT issued not specified
Clarification deadline not specified
Mandatory site visit not specified
Tender deadline (date + time) 2026-02-04T17:00:00+00:00
Expected award not specified
Contract start not specified
Go-live / mobilisation not stated
Date surfaced in documents 2026-02-04T17:00:00+00:00
Date surfaced in documents 12 March 2001
Date surfaced in documents 31 July 2014
Date surfaced in documents September 2025

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 3 months. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

  • VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
  • e successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13 million Public Liability €6.5 million Product Liability [not used] Profess
  • NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED in consideration of the sum of €2.00 (the receipt of which is hereby
  • 2022/2560 and where the notifying party has been in receipt of foreign financial contributions which are valued between €200,000 and €999,000 in the last three (3) years preceding the declaration
  • 2022/2560 and where the notifying party has been in receipt of foreign financial contributions which are valued between €1,000,000 and €3,999,000 in the last three (3) years preceding the declaration
  • up to 6 months with a maximum of two such extension or
  • e right to extend the Term for a period or periods of up to 6 months
  • ontinues for 14 calendar days either Party may terminate at 14 days notice

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

  • Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
  • The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
  • Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

  • Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
  • Consortium / sub-contracting — allowed or addressed in the extracts (Appendix references and reliance provisions).
  • Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
  • Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

  • Source RFT/PQQ filenames: 2025_08_08_DOJ_CCA_Pilot Final.pdf, Appendix 3A: Schedule C – Declaration of non-notifiable foreign financial contributions, Appendix 3A: Schedule D – Declaration of non-notifiable foreign financial contributions.
  • eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
  • Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
  • Key attachments to prioritise: Appendix 1:, Appendix 2:, Schedule.

This tender has been awarded

Can you bid?

Minimum turnover

€100,000

Public liability insurance

€6,500,000

Scoring

Most Economically Advantageous Tender

Lots (1)

Lot 1

Documents (5)

PDF

2025_08_08_DOJ_CCA_Pilot Final.pdf

852.7 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

DOCX

CCA Pilot Evaluation RfT Final 05012026.docx

199.4 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

DOCX

Appendix 4 Declaration as to Personal Circumstances of Tenderer.docx

48.4 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

Appendix_3_Tenderers'_Statement.docx

36.4 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

ESPD Template.docx

158.4 KB · ESPD (European Single Procurement Document)

Original notice text

The Department of Justice seeks tenders for evaluating the Children’s Court Advocate Pilot Project, focusing on supporting children's views in court proceedings over a 3-month contract.

AI analysis updated 4 months ago

Bid ↗
Details

Value

€250k

Deadline

04 Feb

View on eTenders ↗

Location

Ireland

Procedure

Open

Clarification

23 Jan 2026

eTenders ID

7265033

✦ Ask AI about this tender

Ask AI

Knows this tender's documents

Is this a good fit for us?
Based on the deadline, buyer, and eligibility requirements in the tender documents, here's a quick read on fit — with citations back to the exact clause 1 so you can verify it yourself.

Example only — sign up to ask about this tender