Provision of Valuation Services (Lots 5, 6, 10 and 11)

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

2. Scope of Work

Housing and Sustainable Communities Agency ran this procurement for “Provision of Valuation Services (Lots 5, 6, 10 and 11)” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

• Title: Provision of Valuation Services (Lots 5, 6, 10 and 11)
• e successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €12.7 million for any one claim or series of claims a
• the proposed Property Valuation Services Contracts may amount to some €100,000 (excl
• for tenders (“RFT”) from economic operators (“Tenderers”) for the provision of the services
• as described in Appendix 1 to this RFT (the “Services”).
• In summary, the Services comprise: The Housing Agency, in its own capacity, or at the
• valuation services in support of its role to acquire suitable properties for social housing
• Lots 5, 6, 10 and 11 require valuation services conducted by qualified property valuers on
• behalf of the Housing Agency in support of its role to assist local authorities and Approved
• The format of the valuation services required will be determined by the Contracting
• The Service Level Agreement for delivery of services will be:
• The Contracting Authority will appoint one property valuation services economic operator Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

• and related programmes. Valuations will be requested as and when required by the
• Contracting Authority policy seeks to encourage participation on a fair and equal basis by

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

• Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.; e successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €12.7 million for any one claim or series of claims a; Public Liability €6.5 million for any one claim or series of claims a
• Certifications — not specified for this tender
• Past experience — not specified for this tender
• Personnel — not specified for this tender
• Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
• — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• e successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €12.7 million for any one claim or series of claims a
• Public Liability €6.5 million for any one claim or series of claims a
• rising out of a single occurrence Product Liability N/A Professional Indemnity €1,000,000 Lot 10 €500,000 for Lots 5, 6 & 11 2

5. Award criteria & scoring

6. Submission requirements

• Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — Appendix 1 questionnaire/PQQ response was required.
• CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
• Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
• Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
• Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
• Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
• Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
• [FinalCFT-Valuations(Lot5,6,10 and11) (1).pdf] Request for Tenders dated 15/09/2025
• Declaration as to Personal Circumstances of Tenderer
• as described in Appendix 1 to this RFT (the “Services”).
• appropriate. Valuation reports should be in the format provided at Appendix 1A.
• [FinalCFT-Valuations(Lot5,6,10 and11) (1).pdf] format provided at Appendix 1A.
• [FinalCFT-Valuations(Lot5,6,10 and11) (1).pdf] Kerry County

7. Key dates & process

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 24 months. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

• VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
• e successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €12.7 million for any one claim or series of claims a
• NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED in consideration of the sum of €2.00 (the receipt of which is hereby
• up to 12 months with a maximum of two such extension or
• e right to extend the Term for a period or periods of up to 12 months
• are capable of remedy) within 30 days after receipt of a request in writing f
• For the Term and for a period of 12 months thereafter (and save in respect of publ
• The format of the valuation services required will be determined by the Contracting

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

• Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
• The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
• Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

• Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
• Consortium / sub-contracting — allowed or addressed in the extracts (Appendix references and reliance provisions).
• Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
• Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

• Source RFT/PQQ filenames: FinalCFT-Valuations(Lot5,6,10 and11) (1).pdf, Appendix 1:, Appendix 1a:.
• eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
• Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
• Key attachments to prioritise: Appendix 2:, Schedule, Appendix 3:.