NEW BUILD OF A 18M PASSENGER BARGE
Deadline
25 Sep
25 Sep 2025
Deadline
25 Sep
Tender for the construction of an 18m passenger barge for Street Art Ink
Tender for the construction of an 18m passenger barge for Street Art Ink
Bidder profile
Firms with public-sector tender experience and operational capability in construction and service maintenance are preferred.
Risks & flags
- Undisclosed contract value
- Partial visibility of qualification criteria
- Two-step tender process
Briefing
AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.
1. At a glance
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Street Art Ink |
| Title | NEW BUILD OF A 18M PASSENGER BARGE |
| CPV / category | supplies |
| Estimated value | not disclosed |
| Per-year (if multi-year) | not stated |
| Procedure type | not stated |
| Lots | not stated |
| Location | Ireland |
| Contract length | not stated |
| Submission deadline | 2025-09-25T16:30:00+00:00 |
| Go-live / start | not stated |
2. Scope of Work
Street Art Ink ran this procurement for “NEW BUILD OF A 18M PASSENGER BARGE” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:
- Core service configuration, integration, and ongoing support obligations were referenced but not numerically defined in the extract.
- ITT-stage documents were expected to carry the granular technical schedules, acceptance tests, and phased rollout details.
- The bidder had to evidence ability to mobilise, operate, and maintain the contracted service profile for the full term.
3. Background & buyer context
The extract showed a structured PQQ-to-ITT sequence intended to shortlist capable bidders before full award-stage submission. Programme and policy framing was only partially visible, but continuity and modernisation drivers were evident in the procurement design.
4. Eligibility & selection criteria
- Turnover requirement — not specified for this tender
- Insurance — not specified for this tender
- Certifications — not specified for this tender
- Past experience — not specified for this tender
- Personnel — not specified for this tender
- Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender
5. Award criteria & scoring
| Criterion | Weight (%) | Sub-criteria | Pass/fail threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | not stated | Methodology / implementation detail not stated in extract | not stated |
| Price | not stated | Pricing basis not stated in extract | not stated |
| The documents indicated a staged process (qualification, then tender). Any explicit MEAT split is captured above where a numeric line was visible; otherwise it remained not specified in the provided text extract. |
6. Submission requirements
- Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — not specified in extract.
- CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
- Pricing schedule (format/template) — not specified in extract.
- Case studies (number/value range) — not specified in extract.
- Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — not specified in extract.
- Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
- Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
- Value: not disclosed (eTenders placeholder)
7. Key dates & process
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| RFT issued | not specified |
| Clarification deadline | not specified |
| Mandatory site visit | not specified |
| Tender deadline (date + time) | 2025-09-25T16:30:00+00:00 |
| Expected award | not specified |
| Contract start | not specified |
| Go-live / mobilisation | not stated |
| Date surfaced in documents | 2025-09-25T16:30:00+00:00 |
| Date surfaced in documents | 3 Deck 4158 |
| Date surfaced in documents | Object 1000 |
| Date surfaced in documents | Deck 2100 |
8. Contract terms that matter
Contract duration in the extract: not stated. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.
- VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
- *Part Panel Planelayer Cog_len Cog_trans Cog_vert Weight Description *02 09 2025
9. Risks, red flags & unusuals
- Numeric qualification gates were only partially visible, so eligibility certainty required full pack review.
- Contract value was not disclosed in metadata, creating uncertainty on margin, resourcing, and financing assumptions.
- The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
10. SME fit assessment
This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.
- Credible bidder profile — specialist operator with compliant procurement governance and evidencable experience.
- Consortium / sub-contracting — not clearly specified in extract.
- Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
- Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.
11. Where to dig deeper
- Source RFT/PQQ filenames: Parts-cog-list.lst.txt.
- eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
- Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
- Key attachments to prioritise: Appendix/Schedule documents referenced in the source pack.
Scoring
Most Economically Advantageous Tender
Lots (1)
Documents (6)
SA-2000-02 (General Arrangement 09-12-2024).pdf
468.9 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout
SA-2000-02 (General Arrangement 22-11-2024).pdf
462.3 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout
SA-2002-00 (Fire and Safety Plan 09-12-2024).pdf
803.6 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout
SA-2003-00 (Colreg Information 09-12-2024).pdf
329.0 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout
SA-3000-00 1 of 2 (Structural Arrangement 09-12-2024).pdf
323.3 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout
Parts-cog-list.lst.txt
30.9 KB · Other
Original notice text
Street Art Ink seeks a contractor for the new build of an 18m passenger barge, requiring integration and operational support. The project involves building, integrating, and maintaining the service with compliance to reporting obligations.
AI analysis updated 4 months ago
Deadline
25 Sep
Buyer
Street Art InkLocation
The project is located in Ireland, with specific details not disclosed.
Procedure
Open
Clarification
01 Sep 2025
eTenders ID
6360177
Ask AI
Knows this tender's documents
Example only — sign up to ask about this tender