Development of Social Housing Units at Orchard Road, Drumcondra, Dublin 3.

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

2. Scope of Work

FOLD Housing Association Ireland ran this procurement for “Development of Social Housing Units at Orchard Road, Drumcondra, Dublin 3.” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

• Project - System - Spatial Zone - Level - Type - Originator - Role - Number
• Shrubs shall be bushy, well established nursery rock with a good fibrous root system. They shall be container grown, true to size, name and description as scheduled.
• All planters to be provided with a timer controlled irrigation system to provide continuous water supply with mains connection
• [ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-4002.pdf] 32) Window systems Alu Clad

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

• Consulting for FSC and DAC strategy information.

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

• Turnover requirement — not specified for this tender
• Insurance — not specified for this tender
• Certifications — not specified for this tender
• Past experience — not specified for this tender
• Personnel — not specified for this tender
• Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender

5. Award criteria & scoring

6. Submission requirements

• Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — not specified in extract.
• CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
• Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
• Case studies (number/value range) — not specified in extract.
• Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — not specified in extract.
• Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
• Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
• [ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7002.pdf] Level 00
• [ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7002.pdf] Structural Engineers
• [ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7002.pdf] 21-067D
• [ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7201.pdf] BA
• [ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7201.pdf] 31_76_02/IAJ-01
• [ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7103.pdf] BA

7. Key dates & process

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: not stated. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

• VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
• An extension of time of 2 weeks is granted
• [Architect Tender Addendum No. 1.zip] [ZIP containing 9 extracted files]
• Shrubs shall be bushy, well established nursery rock with a good fibrous root system. They shall be container grown, true to size, name and description as scheduled.
• Typical Intermediate Floor Detail, Brick
• First floor slab Overhang Block D East Elevation
• First Floor Slab Overhang Block D North Elevation

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

• Numeric qualification gates were only partially visible, so eligibility certainty required full pack review.
• The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
• Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

• Credible bidder profile — specialist operator with compliant procurement governance and evidencable experience.
• Consortium / sub-contracting — not clearly specified in extract.
• Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
• Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

• Source RFT/PQQ filenames: ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7002.pdf, ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7201.pdf, ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7103.pdf.
• eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
• Clarification contact / portal: [email protected].
• Key attachments to prioritise: ORD-03-SW-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-8007.pdf, ORD-XX-XXX-IS-RAU-AR-0001_P21-067D Orchard Road Issue Sheet.pdf, ORD-21-BB-ZZZ-DR-RAU-AR-7204.pdf.