Property Management Services for Lot 1: Opera Square Estate and Lot 2: One Opera Square

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

2. Scope of Work

Limerick Twenty Thirty DAC ran this procurement for “Property Management Services for Lot 1: Opera Square Estate and Lot 2: One Opera Square for Limerick Twenty Thirty Strategic Development DAC” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

• Title: Property Management Services for Lot 1: Opera Square Estate and Lot 2: One Opera Square for Limerick Twenty Thirty Strategic Development DAC
• cessful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13,000,000 Public Liability €6,500,000 Product Liability N/A Professional Indemnity €3,500,000 Maximum level of excess in any one claim
• Property Management Services €750,000 per
• Property Management Services €750,000 per annum
• tion (the “Services Contract”) will be issued for a term of 36 months
• PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR LOT 1 OPERA SQUARE ESTATE AND LOT 2 ONE OPERA SQUARE FOR
• [Appendix 4.docx] Re: Request for Tenders for the Provision of Property Management Services for;
• 9. Has, in the performance of all public contracts, complied with applicable obligations in the field of environmental, social and labour law that apply at the place where the works are carried out or the services provided, that have been established by EU law, national law, collective agreements or by international, environmental, social and labour law listed in Schedule 7 of the European Union (Award of Public Authority Contracts) Regulations 2016 (Statutory Instrument 284 of 2016).
• 1. Is not guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the Selection Criteria for this Competition and did not withhold such information and did not fail or is not able to submit supporting documents in respect of this Competition as required under Regulation 59 of the European Union (Award of Public Authority Contracts) Regulations 2016 (Statutory Instrument 284 of 2016) .
• RE: Request for Tenders for Property Management Services for;
• Having examined your Request for Tenders (the “RFT”) including the Instructions to Tenderers, the Selection and Award Criteria, the Scope of Services, and the Terms and Conditions of the Services Contracts, we hereby declare the following:
• 1. We understand the nature and extent of the Services required to be delivered as described in the Scope of Services at Appendix 1 to the RFT. Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

• of client funds in excess of €1 million per annum
• Yes. Planning permission is approved for upgrade of existing Georgian buildings
• levels at the existing buildings 4-5 Rutland Street
• maximum value to Limerick Twenty Thirty Strategy Development DAC. The contract is

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

• Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.; cessful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13,000,000 Public Liability €6,500,000 Product Liability N/A Professional Indemnity €3,500,000 Maximum level of excess in any one claim
• Certifications — not specified for this tender
• Past experience — not specified for this tender
• Personnel — not specified for this tender
• Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
• — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• cessful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13,000,000 Public Liability €6,500,000 Product Liability N/A Professional Indemnity €3,500,000 Maximum level of excess in any one claim

5. Award criteria & scoring

6. Submission requirements

• Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — not specified in extract.
• CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
• Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
• Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
• Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
• Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
• Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
• [Schedule of Queries 13.01.25.pdf] 1
• Can Appendix 3 and 4 be provided in Word format as they
• require to be edited by tenderers and submitted. The pdf does not
• Please find attached Appendix 3 and 4 in Word format.
• [Schedule of Queries 13.01.25.pdf] 1st to 3rd floor levels (6 No. 2 bed
• One tender is to be submitted for both Lots 1 and 2 based on the requirements set

7. Key dates & process

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 36 months. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

• VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
• cessful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13,000,000 Public Liability €6,500,000 Product Liability N/A Professional Indemnity €3,500,000 Maximum level of excess in any one claim
• The average minimum turnover will be determined by the turnover for the
• tion (the “Services Contract”) will be issued for a term of 36 months
• Can there be a consideration of extension for submission? Our
• 1. Has never been the subject of a conviction for participation in a criminal organisation, as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA.
• 7. Is not in breach and has not breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes or social security contributions.
• 1. Is not aware of any conflict of interest due to its participation in the Competition;

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

• Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
• The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
• Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

• Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
• Consortium / sub-contracting — allowed or addressed in the extracts (Appendix references and reliance provisions).
• Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
• Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

• Source RFT/PQQ filenames: Schedule of Queries 13.01.25.pdf, Appendix 4.docx, Appendix 3.docx.
• eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
• Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
• Key attachments to prioritise: Request for Tenders RFT.pdf, Schedule of Queries 13.01.25.pdf] 1, Appendix 3 and 4 be provided in Word format as they.