Proposed re-roofing and associated works at Aonad 3, Páirc Ghnó Ghaoth Dobhair, Na Doirí Beaga, Leitir Ceannain, Co. Dún na nGall

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

2. Scope of Work

Údarás Na Gaeltachta_289 ran this procurement for “Proposed re-roofing and associated works at Aonad 3, Páirc Ghnó Ghaoth Dobhair, Na Doirí Beaga, Leitir Ceannain, Co. Dún na nGall” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

• ty Provide a draft manufacturer backed warranty for the roof system to cover a minimum of 20 years post construction
• • *Provide a draft manufacturer backed warranty for the roof system to cover a minimum of 20 years post construction
• The criteria below mirror the structure in Section 3.4 (Technical Capability Criteria) of the Questionnaire for consistency but should be answered specifically in relation to the PSCS service.
• 3.4.2c (HS) LIST of TECHNICAL SERVICES PROVIDED FOR WORKS OVER THE PAST YEARS
• A Contracting Authority may only require Applicants to submit a list of works projects provided over a maximum period of the past 3 years. However, where necessary in order to ensure an adequate level of competition, the Contracting Authority may take into account works delivered over the previous 5 year period. The period specified in the title above is the period within which the Applicant may submit evidence of the service contracts it has delivered; it is not mandatory that projects be evidenced for the whole period. If a firm cannot provide evidence for the entire period (e
• [3.4.2-HS-PSCS-Comptency_ Unit 3.docx] works delivered over the previous 5 year period. The period specified in the title above is the period within which the Applicant may submit evidence of the service contracts it has delivered; it is not mandatory that projects be evidenced for the whole period. If a firm cannot provide evidence for the entire period (e.g. a firm has not been trading for the whole period) this will not be used as a reason to reject its application.
• A list of projects should be provided in the standard form at Appendix B1 List of projects for which there is a Satisfactory Certificate of Delivery of Services in accordance with the particular requirements set out below (if any). The Certificates of Satisfactory Delivery of Services required in relation to these projects should be submitted using the standard form provided at Appendix B3 Certificate of Satisfactory Delivery of Services. Supplementary requirements (if any) will be stated by the Contracting Authority below.
• The evidence required to pass this criterion is details of relevant technicians or technical bodies upon whom the Applicant can call on in order to carry out the work or whom the Applicant can use in regard to quality control with regards to Health and Safety. The Applicant must also provide evidence of a safety management system.
• Where the response type above is “DECLARATION REQUIRED” the Applicant declares that it meets the requirements set out above and in Appendix 1 to this Supplement. Evidence in support of the declarations in Appendix 1 and any requirements set out above must be provided when requested by the Contracting Authority.In place of documentary evidence, Applicants may provide third party certification that their safety management system is in accordance with OHSAS 18001 or equivalent. Certified membership of Safe-T-Cert may be deemed equivalent for the purposes of this criterion.
• 3.4.2e (HS) A STATEMENT OF THE AVERAGE ANNUAL NUMBERS OF PERSONS EMPLOYED TO PROVIDE PSCS SERVICES AND THOSE IN A MANAGERIAL POSITION OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS
• for the provision of the services of Project Supervisor for the Construction Stage pursuant to
• and binding. The Employers Representative shall retain the right of selecting the firm who shall supply, or Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

• PROGRAMME IS TO BE COMPLETED BY 31st MARCH 2025
• 2. We are familiar with our duties as outlined in Part 2 Regulations 16-23 of the Safety Health & Welfare at Work (Construction) Regulations 2013. We are aware of and will take into account and communicate to all contractors (including Specialists) the general principles of prevention as enumerated below when coordinating organisational of technical aspects of the project or the programme and undertake to liaise with, communicate and facilitate cooperation amongst the other duty holders under those Regulations, specifically Regulations 16 and 17 of the Safety, Health & Welfare at Work (Construction) Regulations 2013.
• • Health and Safety Policy and Organisation;
• • a copy of our current general health and safety policy; * a general Health and Safety policy document appropriate to a Health and Safety led Construction Management function;

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

• Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.; Minimum indemnity limit for Public liability insurance: €6,500,000[7] for any one event, bu; Minimum indemnity limit for Employers’ liability insurance: €13,000,000[8] for any one event
• Certifications — not specified for this tender
• Past experience — not specified for this tender
• Personnel — not specified for this tender
• Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
• — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• Minimum indemnity limit for Public liability insurance: €6,500,000[7] for any one event, bu
• Minimum indemnity limit for Employers’ liability insurance: €13,000,000[8] for any one event
• Maximum excess for Public liability: €10,000~~[[10 liability insurance: €13,000,000[8] for any one event
• Maximum excess for Public liability: €10,000~~[10]~~ in respect of p
• Turnover Requirement Area of Business/Work: Yearly Turnover arising from the area of work specified: Roofing, Cladding & Structural Steel[16] € 750,000 *

5. Award criteria & scoring

• The excess as stated here: Maximum permissible excess on Profess 2% not stated not stated The documents indicated a staged process (qualification, then tender). Any explicit MEAT split is captured above where a numeric line was visible; otherwise it remained not specified in the provided text extract.

6. Submission requirements

• Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — Appendix 1 questionnaire/PQQ response was required.
• CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
• Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
• Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
• Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
• Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
• Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
• The criteria below mirror the structure in Section 3.4 (Technical Capability Criteria) of the Questionnaire for consistency but should be answered specifically in relation to the PSCS service.
• The evidence required to pass this criterion should be submitted in the form of a document setting out the Applicant’s organisational structure and the curricula vitae of the Applicant’s management
• The evidence required to pass this criterion should be submitted in the form of a document setting out the Applicant’s organisational structure and the curricula vitae of the Applicant’s management staff and any additional requirements that may be set out below. The curriculum vitae of each management staff member should indicate their relevant educational and professional qualifications and Health and Safety training and qualifications (for example, degree, diploma, certificate, CPD), their experience on projects of a similar scale and complexity, and the role they had on those projects.
• The evidence required to pass this criterion should be submitted in the form of a document setting out the Applicant’s organisational structure and the curricula vitae of the Applicant’s personnel and any additional requirements that may be set out below. The curriculum vitae of each of the Applicant’s personnel should indicate their relevant educational and professional qualifications and
• [3.4.2-HS-PSCS-Comptency_ Unit 3.docx] pass this criterion should be submitted in the form of a document setting out the Applicant’s organisational structure and the curricula vitae of the Applicant’s personnel and any additional requirements that may be set out below. The curriculum vitae of each of the Applicant’s personnel should indicate their relevant educational and professional qualifications and Health and Safety training and qualifications (for example, degree, diploma, certificate, CPD), their experience on projects of a similar scale and complexity, and the role they had on those projects.
• A Contracting Authority may only require Applicants to submit a list of works projects provided over a maximum period of the past 3 years. However, where necessary in order to ensure an adequate level of competition, the Contracting Authority may take into account works delivered over the previous 5 year period. The period specified in the title above is the period within which the Applicant may submit evidence of the service contracts it has delivered; it is not mandatory that projects be evidenced for the whole period. If a firm cannot provide evidence for the entire period (e

7. Key dates & process

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 20 years. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

• VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
• Minimum amount for interim payments, except release of retention, € 0
• with relevant Standards and Codes of Practice, particularly BS EN 12811-1 'Temporary works equipment
• k sub-contractor must have a CE Marking in conformance with BS EN 1090-1
• Within 3 months after receipt of the Contractor’s final statement, the Employer’s
• lace arrangements to complete the Works within 6 months after the termination, the Employer’s Representative shall issue this certificate as
• Allow 14 days from the date of receipt by the Employe
• the date 10 days before the last day for receipt of the

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

• Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
• The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
• Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

• Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
• Consortium / sub-contracting — allowed or addressed in the extracts (Appendix references and reliance provisions).
• Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
• Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

• Source RFT/PQQ filenames: 3.4.2-HS-PSCS-Comptency_ Unit 3.docx, July 2024 Civil Engineering Specification for Re-roofing & Associated Works at Aonad 3.pdf, Appendix-B2-Certificate-of-Satisfactory-Project-Execution.docx.
• eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
• Clarification contact / portal: [email protected].
• Key attachments to prioritise: Schedule, Schedule, part 2D) , Schedule and.