Request for Tenders for Design, Build and Implementation of a Modern Methods of Construction Software Platform

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

2. Scope of Work

Construction IT Alliance ran this procurement for “Request for Tenders for Design, Build and Implementation of a Modern Methods of Construction Software Platform” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

• Title: Request for Tenders for Design, Build and Implementation of a Modern Methods of Construction Software Platform
• the proposed Service Contract may amount to some €220,000 (excl
• for this RFP covers the design, build and deployment with 2 months post deployment maintenance
• with 2 months post deployment maintenance
• 24/7 coverage and 2 day onsite support
• 24/7 coverage and 2 day onsite support response
• for Design, Build and Implementation of a Modern
• (“RFT”) from economic operators (“Tenderers”) for the provision of the services as
• described in Appendix 1 to this RFT (the “Services”).
• The aim of the platform is to promote the value of Modern Methods of Construction (MMC)
• array of end user profiles that the platform will need to cater for.
• The foundation of the platform will be geared towards accelerating uptake/use of MMC by Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

• The platform will also act as a key multi-disciplinary-wide policy lever to support the
• “signposting” existing content and fostering collaboration between these entities for the
• construction policy and innovation, acting as a bridge and forum to stimulate a collaborate
• Contracting Authority policy seeks to encourage participation on a fair and equal basis by

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

• Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.; ace if applicable Insurance Type Level required Level in Place Details of Excess Renewal Date Employers Liability €13,000,000 € Public Liability €6,500,000 € Product Liability n/a n/a n/a n/a Professional Indemnity €1,000,000 € Cyber Liabilit
• Certifications — not specified for this tender
• Past experience — not specified for this tender
• Personnel — not specified for this tender
• Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
• — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• Tenderers (on a solo or cumulative basis) meet the minimum turnover requirement of €400,000 in line with the tender estimated budget
• ace if applicable Insurance Type Level required Level in Place Details of Excess Renewal Date Employers Liability €13,000,000 € Public Liability €6,500,000 € Product Liability n/a n/a n/a n/a Professional Indemnity €1,000,000 € Cyber Liabilit

5. Award criteria & scoring

6. Submission requirements

• Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — Appendix 1 questionnaire/PQQ response was required.
• CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
• Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
• Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
• Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
• Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
• Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
• their solution as per the minimum requirement in Appendix 1
• [240516 CitA Skillnet - RFP.pdf] Request for Tenders dated 16/05/2024
• Declaration as to Personal Circumstances of Tenderer
• described in Appendix 1 to this RFT (the “Services”).
• [240516 CitA Skillnet - RFP.pdf] increased use of MMC in the sector “all under one roof”.
• [240516 CitA Skillnet - RFP.pdf] green and digital futures.

7. Key dates & process

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 2 months. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

• VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
• NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED in consideration of the sum of €2.00 (the receipt of which is hereby
• ontinues for 10 calendar days either Party may terminate at 14 days notice
• of remedy) within 30 days after receipt of a request in writing f
• For the Term and for a period of 12 months thereafter (and save in respect of publ
• The platform will also act as a key multi-disciplinary-wide policy lever to support the
• currently exists. This platform will seek to “connect” these islands of innovation by
• that may result from this Competition (the “Services Contract”) will be issued for a term of

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

• Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
• The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
• Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

• Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
• Consortium / sub-contracting — allowed or addressed in the extracts (Appendix references and reliance provisions).
• Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
• Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

• Source RFT/PQQ filenames: 240516 CitA Skillnet - RFP.pdf, Appendix 1, Appendix 1:.
• eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
• Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
• Key attachments to prioritise: Appendix 2:, Schedule, Appendix 3:.