Skip to content
TenderMatch
The recorded submission deadline has passed. Find open opportunities. Check the official notice for amendments.
← Tenders / TEN2400019 - RFT for Architect/Building M and E Services Led Design Team Consultancy Services for Local Authority Energy Pathfinder - Cavan County Council
Awarded Engineering Consultancy Services SME Suitable Open

TEN2400019 - RFT for Architect/Building M and E Services Led Design Team Consultancy Services for Local Authority Energy Pathfinder - Cavan County Council

Value

€168k

Deadline

28 Mar

Consultancy services for energy pathfinder project in Cavan County Council

SME fit: High Bid effort: Medium 📍 Cavan

Consultancy services for energy pathfinder project in Cavan County Council

Bidder profile

Ideal for firms experienced in public sector consultancy with strong compliance and insurance capabilities.

Risks & flags

  • Information asymmetry
  • Compliance risks
  • Tight timelines

Briefing

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

Field Detail
Buyer Cavan County Council
Title TEN2400019 - RFT for Architect/Building M and E Services Led Design Team Consultancy Services for Local Authority Energy Pathfinder - Cavan County Council
CPV / category services / Engineering Consultancy
Estimated value €168000.00
Per-year (if multi-year) not stated
Procedure type not stated
Lots not stated
Location not stated
Contract length not stated
Submission deadline 2024-03-28T12:00:00+00:00
Go-live / start not stated

2. Scope of Work

This procurement covered the supply scope described in the tender pack for TEN2400019 - RFT for Architect/Building M and E Services Led Design Team Consultancy Services for Local Authority Energy Pathfinder - Cavan County Council. The contract shape pointed to operational delivery against buyer demand, documented ordering, and conformance with specification, quality, and administrative requirements set out in the RFT documents. The package indicated a formal competition route with standard Irish public-procurement controls around qualification, response formatting, and deadline compliance.

  • Contract title and category indicate supply activity for Engineering Consultancy under buyer workflows in Cavan County Council.
  • Submission package must align with the RFT structure published through the buyer's procurement channel.
  • Day-to-day obligations include order fulfilment, documentation, and conformance with specification, quality, and administrative requirements.
  • Technical and commercial responses must map directly to mandatory requirements and the pricing schedule format in the tender pack.
  • Evidence trail must be maintained for declarations, eligibility proofs, and any product or service specifications named in attachments.
  • Numerical obligations surfaced in the verified extract: (i) Level of cover and excess as stated below for the Principal Service Provider: Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Cover on Each And Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis € 1,250,000[12] € 1,500,000[13] Maximum level o; Level of cover and excess as stated below for Specialist Skill Providers; Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Specialist Skill Provider Cover on Each And Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis BER Assessor € 750,000 € 1,000,000 € € € € € € ; Minimum level of Public Liability Insurance required in respect of any one accident: € 6500000[14] Maximum level of excess for property only* for any one incident below which the Service Providerwill bear the cost: € 10,000 * No excess is permitted in respec

The source material indicated that bidders had to ground claims in tender forms and supporting evidence, rather than generic company profiles. Where the verified extract provided numerical conditions, those figures were treated as the binding baseline for suitability. Where the extract did not provide a number, the requirement remained not specified at briefing stage and required direct review of the underlying attachment before pricing sign-off.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer ran this competition to secure a structured procurement route for the stated category and keep continuity of supply under public-sector purchasing controls. The tender format suggested a compliance-led process with a defined close date and a document trail through the procurement portal. The context indicated a need for contract certainty, auditable supplier selection, and predictable service or goods availability during the contract term. No explicit incumbent detail was surfaced in the verified extract provided to this worker, so incumbent advantage had to be assessed from full attachment review and clarification responses.

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

  • Turnover requirement — turnover or €5,000
  • Insurance
  • Public Liability — €6500000
  • Employer's Liability — €13,000,000
  • Professional Indemnity — €1,250,000
  • Certifications — not specified for this tender
  • Past experience — not specified for this tender
  • Personnel — not specified for this tender
  • Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender

Binding numerical extract used for this section: (i) Level of cover and excess as stated below for the Principal Service Provider: Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Cover on Each And Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis € 1,250,000[12] € 1,500,000[13] Maximum level o; Level of cover and excess as stated below for Specialist Skill Providers; Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Specialist Skill Provider Cover on Each And Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis BER Assessor € 750,000 € 1,000,000 € € € € € € ; Minimum level of Public Liability Insurance required in respect of any one accident: € 6500000[14] Maximum level of excess for property only* for any one incident below which the Service Providerwill bear the cost: € 10,000 * No excess is permitted in respec

5. Award criteria & scoring

The award model followed MEAT-style evaluation where published criteria and weights governed scoring after qualification. The exact weighting structure required confirmation from the pricing and quality schedules if not explicit in the extract below.

Criterion Weight (%) Sub-criteria Minimum threshold
Council Chamber Committee 50 not stated not stated

Price/quality split: MEAT). The marks for.

6. Submission requirements

  • Method statement / response document — complete the buyer template and answer each requirement in the order requested; page limits not stated in the extract.
  • CVs — provide role-based CVs where requested; page count not stated.
  • Pricing schedule — submit the issued pricing schedule in its required format; alternative layouts were not stated as acceptable.
  • Case studies — number and value bands not stated in the extract.
  • Declarations — include ESPD or equivalent declarations, tax and legal standing confirmations, and conflict disclosures where requested by the pack.
  • Mandatory site visit — not stated in the extract.
  • Submission portal — submit via eTenders or the named portal before the stated deadline; late submissions are typically non-compliant.

7. Key dates & process

Milestone Date / timing
RFT issued not stated
Clarification deadline not stated
Mandatory site visit not stated
Tender deadline (date + time) 2024-03-28T12:00:00+00:00
Expected award not stated
Contract start not stated
Go-live / mobilisation not stated

8. Contract terms that matter

The contract term and extension mechanics were not fully stated in the extracted metadata, so bidders had to read the form of contract and schedules for binding duration language. Payment timing, service levels, and remedies for non-performance were also attachment-driven in this pack. IP, subcontracting permission, and any security instruments such as bonds or guarantees were not explicit in the verified extract supplied here. The practical implication was that commercial risk sat in the contract appendices, and bid/no-bid confidence depended on reviewing those clauses before final pricing.

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

The main risk in this competition was information asymmetry between headline metadata and full contractual detail. Numerical gates for insurance appeared in the verified extract, but other qualification thresholds were not explicitly surfaced, so an under-scoped response could fail on compliance before scoring. Another risk was timeline compression if clarification timing and mobilisation expectations were tighter in the attachments than in the metadata view. No specific unusual legal mechanism was confirmed in the extract provided to this worker; the red-flag check therefore depended on line-by-line attachment review.

10. SME fit assessment

This tender looked most accessible to firms that already operated in the stated category and could evidence public-procurement compliance at submission stage. A credible bidder profile was a supplier with documented quality controls, tender-writing capacity, and insurance levels aligned to the verified figures where listed. Consortium or named subcontracting arrangements were not specified in the extract and needed confirmation in the RFT rules. Bid-preparation effort was typically several working days for data gathering, drafting, pricing, and internal approvals, with additional time if technical attachments were extensive. Pwin signals from this extract alone were neutral because incumbent status and prior winners were not explicitly surfaced.

11. Where to dig deeper

  • Source RFT file(s): 1.1-Letter of Invitation to Tender.pdf, 3.2-Instructions to Tenderers ITT-S2b.pdf
  • eTenders CFT ID: not stated
  • Clarification contact / portal: eTenders clarification portal
  • Priority attachments: 1.1-Letter of Invitation to Tender.pdf, 3.2-Instructions to Tenderers ITT-S2b.pdf, Appendix_D.docx

This tender has been awarded

Can you bid?

Required certifications

  • ISO 9001
  • Safe-T-Cert

Minimum turnover

€5,000

Public liability insurance

€6,500,000

Professional indemnity insurance

€1,250,000

Scoring

Most Economically Advantageous Tender

Documents (81)

DOCX

3.5-Project Execution Plan.docx

101.8 KB · Specification

DOCX

Cavan county council buildings floor area.docx

23.0 KB · Specification

PDF

GN-1.6.3-Minimum-standards-v1.0-16-07-13.pdf

878.3 KB · Specification

DOCX

1.1-Letter of Invitation to Tender.docx

78.0 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

PDF

1.1-Letter of Invitation to Tender.pdf

154.5 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

DOCX

3.2-Instructions to Tenderers ITT-S2b.docx

130.2 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

PDF

3.2-Instructions to Tenderers ITT-S2b.pdf

410.9 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

PDF

Gravity Group - Quotation 211443 - Crosserlough Construction - Old Reference Library.pdf

524.0 KB · Pricing / BOQ / Schedule of Rates

DOCX

3.3-FTS9-v1.9-31-03-2023.docx

267.4 KB · Contract / Agreement / Terms

DOCX

3.6-COE1-v.2i-31-03-2023-1.docx

81.8 KB · Contract / Agreement / Terms

PDF

3.6-COE1-v.2i-31-03-2023-1.pdf

341.1 KB · Contract / Agreement / Terms

DOCX

Architect_QC2-Part-1.docx

139.5 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

Architect_QC2-Part-2.docx

72.8 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

PDF

CCC_001_Johnston Central Library_DEC.pdf

350.2 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

PDF

CCC_004_Machinery Yard Moynehall_DEC.pdf

350.2 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

PDF

Certificate of Air Monitoring - Old Library - Cavan Co Co.pdf

361.2 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

PDF

Certificate of Cleanliness - Old Library - Cavan Co Co.pdf

150.8 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

M&E Eng_QC2-Part-1.docx

141.4 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

M&E Eng_QC2-Part-2.docx

70.8 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

QS QC2 Part-1.docx

141.5 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

QS_QC2-Part-2.docx

72.7 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

PDF

courthouse 2nd & 3rd floors.pdf

230.0 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

courthouse basement.pdf

74.6 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

courthouse first floor.pdf

122.6 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

courthouse ground floor.pdf

78.2 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

library ff.pdf

12.4 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

library gf.pdf

155.3 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

library sf.pdf

146.3 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

Moynehall.pdf

71.5 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

old lib ff.pdf

40.3 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

old lib gf.pdf

47.8 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

old lib sf.pdf

42.1 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

sports complex basement.pdf

33.8 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

sports complex ff.pdf

42.2 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

sports complex gf.pdf

65.9 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

PDF

3.1-Project Information Memorandum (PIM) Border.pdf

221.1 KB · Other

PDF

3.5-Project Execution Plan.pdf

362.1 KB · Other

PDF

A-00229 - Old Reference Library - Management.pdf

4.8 MB · Other

PDF

April 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

Aug 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

CCC_001_Cavan Library_BER Upgrade Report.pdf

1.5 MB · Other

PDF

CCC_002_Cavan Courthouse_BER Upgrade Report.pdf

1.7 MB · Other

PDF

CCC_002_Cavan Courthouse_DEC.pdf

350.2 KB · Other

PDF

CCC_003_Old Library Building_BER Upgrade Report.pdf

1.6 MB · Other

PDF

CCC_003_Old Library Building_DEC.pdf

350.2 KB · Other

PDF

CCC_004_Machinery Yard_BER Upgrade Report.pdf

1.6 MB · Other

PDF

CCC_005_Cavan Leisure Centre_BER Upgrade Report.pdf

1.5 MB · Other

PDF

CCC_006_Road Design Office_BER Upgrade Report.pdf

1.0 MB · Other

PDF

Dec 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

Feb 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

Jan 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

Jan 2023 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

July 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

June 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

March 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

May 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

Nov 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

Oct 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

PDF

Sept 2022 Elec.pdf

2.5 MB · Other

DOCX

1.2-Schedule of Tender Docs.docx

113.4 KB · Appendix / Annex

PDF

1.2-Schedule of Tender Docs.pdf

137.4 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

1.3-Tender Submission Checklist.docx

37.8 KB · Tender Response Template

DOCX

3.1-Project Information Memorandum (PIM) Border.docx

204.2 KB · Appendix / Annex

XLSX

3.4-Pricing Schedule.xlsx

25.5 KB

DOCX

Appendix_A.docx

44.0 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

Appendix_B1.docx

25.8 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

Appendix_B3.docx

27.7 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

Appendix_C.docx

34.1 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

Appendix_D.docx

33.1 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

Appendix_D1 Staff CV.docx

62.0 KB · Appendix / Annex

PDF

Apr 2022 Elec.pdf

2.8 MB

XLSX

Cavan Facilities Contacts.xlsx

20.5 KB

PDF

CLARIFICATION 1 - Extension of Time.pdf

137.3 KB · Clarification / Addendum

XLSX

Copy of Appendix A.xlsx

53.6 KB

XLSX

Copy of Cavan Co Co Building Details.xlsx

20.6 KB

XLSX

Copy of Cavan_LA Energy Pathfinder_Occupancy Schedule_Contact.xlsx

92.0 KB

XLSX

Copy of Kerosene - Gas Oil 2022.xlsx

23.1 KB

DOCX

email.docx

21.6 KB · Clarification / Addendum

PDF

GN-1.1.2-v1.0-09-02-2022.pdf

526.9 KB · Insurance / Indemnity

PDF

GN-1.6.4-v1.0-31-03-2023.pdf

330.4 KB · Insurance / Indemnity

ZIP

SAQ incl ESPD.zip

1.2 MB · ESPD (European Single Procurement Document)

Original notice text

Cavan County Council seeks consultancy services for an energy pathfinder project, focusing on architectural and engineering design led by a multidisciplinary team, ensuring compliance with public procurement standards.

AI analysis updated 4 months ago

Bid ↗
Details

Value

€168k

Deadline

28 Mar

View on eTenders ↗

Location

Cavan County Council area, specific location not stated.

Procedure

Open

Clarification

22 Feb 2024

eTenders ID

3023760

✦ Ask AI about this tender

Ask AI

Knows this tender's documents

Is this a good fit for us?
Based on the deadline, buyer, and eligibility requirements in the tender documents, here's a quick read on fit — with citations back to the exact clause 1 so you can verify it yourself.

Example only — sign up to ask about this tender