Provision of Economic and Technical Consultancy Support for Electricity Networks Price Review 6 (PR6)

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

2. Scope of Work

Commission for Regulation of Utilities ran this procurement for “Provision of Economic and Technical Consultancy Support for Electricity Networks Price Review 6 (PR6)” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

• Title: Provision of Economic and Technical Consultancy Support for Electricity Networks Price Review 6 (PR6)
• cessful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13 million Public Liability €6.5 million Professional Indemnity €2
• he Services to be provided under the Services Contract under three (3) separate contracts, each with a minimum value of €250,000.
• tor shall be required to supply its Tax Clearance Access Number and Tax
• “Ad hoc/Contingency” support, which will be capped at 220 days at the day rate per
• Economic & Technical Consultancy Support
• Capitalised terms have the meaning given to them in the Services Contract, unless they are
• addition, capitalised terms not defined below or in the Services Contract have the meaning
• Assumptions and no Approved Assumptions will be incorporated in the Services Contract,
• Contractor means the successful Tenderer who enters into a Services Contract with the
• the Services as set out in Appendix 1 of this RFT (and, if the Competition is split into Lots,
• Services means the Services to be performed under the Services Contract, as more Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

• Contracting Authority policy seeks to encourage participation on a fair and equal basis

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

• Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.; cessful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13 million Public Liability €6.5 million Professional Indemnity €2
• Certifications — not specified for this tender
• Past experience — not specified for this tender
• Personnel — not specified for this tender
• Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
• — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• cessful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13 million Public Liability €6.5 million Professional Indemnity €2

5. Award criteria & scoring

6. Submission requirements

• Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — Appendix 1 questionnaire/PQQ response was required.
• CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
• Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
• Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
• Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
• Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
• Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
• [011-03-537 OJEU Request for Tender PR6 Final.pdf] Request for Tenders dated
• Declaration as to Personal Circumstances of
• [011-03-537 OJEU Request for Tender PR6 Final.pdf] into Lots, includes, as the context so admits or
• ESPD means the Electronic European Single Procurement Document (“ESPD”)
• [011-03-537 OJEU Request for Tender PR6 Final.pdf] Competition is split into Lots, the Lots more particularly described in
• the Services as set out in Appendix 1 of this RFT (and, if the Competition is split into Lots,

7. Key dates & process

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 5 years. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

• VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
• cessful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services Contract the following insurances: Type of Insurance Indemnity Limit Employer’s Liability €13 million Public Liability €6.5 million Professional Indemnity €2
• the Term) is in the order of approximately €1.9m (excl
• NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED in consideration of the sum of €2.00 (the receipt of which is
• the Term for 2 (two) periods of 12 Months with a maximum of 2 (two) such extensio
• breach(es) are capable of remedy) within 30 days after receipt of a request
• For the Term and for a period of 12 months thereafter (and save in respect of publ
• Capitalised terms have the meaning given to them in the Services Contract, unless they are

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

• Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
• The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
• Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

• Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
• Consortium / sub-contracting — allowed or addressed in the extracts (Appendix references and reliance provisions).
• Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
• Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

• Source RFT/PQQ filenames: 011-03-537 OJEU Request for Tender PR6 Final.pdf, Appendix 1:, Appendix 2:.
• eTenders CFT / notice reference: OJEU Request for Tender PR6 Final.pdf] Request for Tenders dated.
• Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
• Key attachments to prioritise: Schedule, Appendix 3:, Appendix 4:.