Skip to content
TenderMatch
The recorded submission deadline has passed. Find open opportunities. Check the official notice for amendments.
← Tenders / ALL Strategy e-learning course development
Awarded Training & Education Services SME Suitable Open

ALL Strategy e-learning course development

Deadline

08 Jan

Development of e-learning courses for the Adult Literacy for Life Strategy

SME fit: Medium Bid effort: Medium 📍 Ireland

Development of e-learning courses for the Adult Literacy for Life Strategy

Bidder profile

Mid-sized to large firms with experience in public sector tenders and e-learning development.

Risks & flags

  • Qualification gate
  • Undisclosed contract value
  • Two-step process

Briefing

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

Field Detail
Buyer SOLAS
Title ALL Strategy e-learning course development
CPV / category services
Estimated value not disclosed
Per-year (if multi-year) not stated
Procedure type not stated
Lots not stated
Location Ireland
Contract length 3 years
Submission deadline 2024-01-08T13:00:00+00:00
Go-live / start not stated

2. Scope of Work

SOLAS ran this procurement for “ALL Strategy e-learning course development” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

  • VAT) of at least €150,000 relevant to the services outlined in this RFT, for each of the last three (3) f
  • € .1 The successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services
  • economic operators (“Tenderers”) for the provision of the services as described in
  • Appendix 1: Requirements and Specifications, to this RFT, (“the Services”). Long
  • 2.3.1 Tenderers should note the terms and conditions of the Services Contract set out at
  • the Services Contract by signing the Tenderer’s Statement at Appendix 3. Tenderers
  • may not amend the Services Contract.
  • involved in the provision of the Services;
  • [2318-SO-N - ALL Strategy eLearning Course Development_SRFT.pdf] involved in the provision of the Services;
  • 2.10.6 Any currency variations occurring over the term of the Services Contract shall be
  • 2.10.8 Payments for Services provided pursuant to this RFT shall be subject to and made
  • in accordance with the Services Contract at Appendix 5 to this RFT. Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

  • Title: ALL Strategy e-learning course development
  • [2318-SO-N - ALL Strategy eLearning Course Development_SRFT.pdf] for Tender (“RFT”) from
  • courses for the Adult Literacy for Life (ALL) Strategy.
  • of short e-learning courses for the Adult Literacy for Life (ALL) Strategy.

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

  • Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
  • Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.; r series of claims arising out of a single occurrence €1m for any one claim or series of claims arising out of a single occurrence Public Liability €6.5m for any one claim or series €1m for; r series of claims arising out of a single occurrence €1m for any one claim or series of claims arising out of a single occurrence Public Liability €6.5m for any one claim or series of claims a
  • Certifications — not specified for this tender
  • Past experience — • Annual Turnover Requirement That they have achieved a Turnover of €150,000 for each of the last 3 years (see Secti
  • Personnel — not specified for this tender
  • Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
  • — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
  • r series of claims arising out of a single occurrence €1m for any one claim or series of claims arising out of a single occurrence Public Liability €6.5m for any one claim or series €1m for
  • r series of claims arising out of a single occurrence €1m for any one claim or series of claims arising out of a single occurrence Public Liability €6.5m for any one claim or series of claims a
  • 5m for any one claim or series of claims arising out of a single occurrence Employers Liability €12.7m for any one claim or series of claims a
  • 7m for any one claim or series of claims arising out of a single occurrence Cyber Liability €1m for any one claim or series of claims arising out of a single occurrence €1m for any one claim or series of claims a
  • urances: Insurance Type SOLAS Requirement Professional Liability €1m for any one claim or series of claims arising out of a single occurrence Public Liability € .1 The successful Tenderer shall be require

5. Award criteria & scoring

Criterion Weight (%) Sub-criteria Pass/fail threshold
Quality not stated Methodology / implementation detail not stated in extract not stated
Price not stated Pricing basis not stated in extract not stated
The documents indicated a staged process (qualification, then tender). Any explicit MEAT split is captured above where a numeric line was visible; otherwise it remained not specified in the provided text extract.

6. Submission requirements

  • Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — Appendix 1 questionnaire/PQQ response was required.
  • CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
  • Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
  • Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
  • Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
  • Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
  • Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
  • Value: not disclosed (eTenders placeholder)
  • [2318-SO-N - ALL Strategy eLearning Course Development_SRFT.pdf] for Tender (“RFT”) from
  • Appendix 1: Requirements and Specifications, to this RFT, (“the Services”). Long
  • [2318-SO-N - ALL Strategy eLearning Course Development_SRFT.pdf] conclusions about the solution needed to meet the requirements
  • [2318-SO-N - ALL Strategy eLearning Course Development_SRFT.pdf] repealing Directive
  • Evaluation Team and the supplier of the etenders.gov.ie website, for the purposes

7. Key dates & process

Milestone Date
RFT issued not specified
Clarification deadline not specified
Mandatory site visit not specified
Tender deadline (date + time) 2024-01-08T13:00:00+00:00
Expected award not specified
Contract start not specified
Go-live / mobilisation not stated
Date surfaced in documents 2024-01-08T13:00:00+00:00
Date surfaced in documents 08 January 2024
Date surfaced in documents 19 December 2023
Date surfaced in documents 12 March 2001

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 3 years. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

  • VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
  • € .1 The successful Tenderer shall be required to hold for the term of the Services
  • breach(es) are capable of remedy) within 30 days after receipt of a request in
  • For the Term and for a period of 12 months thereafter (and save in respect of publ
  • issued for a term of nine (9) months (“the Term”).
  • SOLAS reserves the right to extend the Term for a period or periods of up to three
  • (3) months with a maximum of one (1) such extension or extensions on the same
  • terms and conditions, subject to SOLAS’ obligations at law.

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

  • Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
  • Contract value was not disclosed in metadata, creating uncertainty on margin, resourcing, and financing assumptions.
  • The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
  • Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

  • Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
  • Consortium / sub-contracting — allowed or addressed in the extracts (Appendix references and reliance provisions).
  • Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
  • Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

  • Source RFT/PQQ filenames: 2318-SO-N - ALL Strategy eLearning Course Development_SRFT.pdf, RFT, for each of the last three (3) f, RFT”) from.
  • eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
  • Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
  • Key attachments to prioritise: Appendix 1: Requirements and Specifications, to this RFT, (“the Services”). Long, RFT is Request for Tender for the development of short e-learning, RFT.

This tender has been awarded

Can you bid?

Minimum turnover

€450,000

Public liability insurance

€6,500,000

Professional indemnity insurance

€1,000,000

Scoring

Most Economically Advantageous Tender

Quality of proposed e-learning course development

Price

Lots (1)

Lot 1

Documents (2)

PDF

2318-SO-N - ALL Strategy eLearning Course Development_SRFT.pdf

577.1 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

DOCX

2318-SO-N - ALL Strategy eLearning Course Development_TRD.docx

142.1 KB · Tender Response Template

Original notice text

SOLAS seeks a provider for the development of e-learning courses as part of the Adult Literacy for Life Strategy, requiring implementation and ongoing service execution over a 3-year contract.

AI analysis updated 4 months ago

Bid ↗
Details

Deadline

08 Jan

View on eTenders ↗

Buyer

SOLAS

Location

SOLAS headquarters or other designated locations

Procedure

Open

Clarification

19 Dec 2023

eTenders ID

2779152

✦ Ask AI about this tender

Ask AI

Knows this tender's documents

Is this a good fit for us?
Based on the deadline, buyer, and eligibility requirements in the tender documents, here's a quick read on fit — with citations back to the exact clause 1 so you can verify it yourself.

Example only — sign up to ask about this tender