LI2627C - Maynooth University - RFT for the Provision of a Reading List Software/Resource List Management System
Deadline
21 Nov
21 Nov 2023
Deadline
21 Nov
RFT for Reading List Software/Resource List Management System for Maynooth University
RFT for Reading List Software/Resource List Management System for Maynooth University
Bidder profile
Firms with experience in public sector IT services and a strong track record in software implementation.
Risks & flags
- undisclosed contract value
- two-step tender process
- qualification ambiguity
Briefing
AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.
1. At a glance
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Education Procurement Service (EPS) |
| Title | LI2627C - Maynooth University - RFT for the Provision of a Reading List Software/Resource List Management System |
| CPV / category | services |
| Estimated value | not disclosed |
| Per-year (if multi-year) | not stated |
| Procedure type | not stated |
| Lots | not stated |
| Location | Ireland |
| Contract length | 12 months |
| Submission deadline | 2023-11-21T14:00:00+00:00 |
| Go-live / start | not stated |
2. Scope of Work
Education Procurement Service (EPS) ran this procurement for “LI2627C - Maynooth University - RFT for the Provision of a Reading List Software/Resource List Management System” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:
- Title: LI2627C - Maynooth University - RFT for the Provision of a Reading List Software/Resource List Management System
- Buyer: Education Procurement Service (EPS)
- rer shall be required to supply its Tax Clearance Access Number and Tax Reference Number to facilitate online verification of their tax status by
- ificate Tenderers must supply its Tax Clearance Access Number and Tax Reference Number issued by the Irish Revenue Commissioner to facilitate o
- Request for Tenders under Open National Procedure dated for the Provision of Reading List Software/Resource List Management System for Maynooth University
- Prior to and as a condition of award of any Services Contract, the successful Tenderer shall
- Prior to and as a condition of award of any Services Contract, the successful Tenderer shall be required to designate a single entity who will carry overall responsibility for the Services Contract (the “Prime Contractor”), irrespective of whether or not tasks are to be performed by a subcontractor or other consortium member (the “Subcontractor”).
- No publicity regarding this Competition or any Services Contract pursuant to this Competition is permitted unless and until the Contracting Authority has given its prior written consent to the relevant communication.
- The terms “Registrable Interest” and “Relative” shall be interpreted as per Section 2 of the Ethics in Public Office Acts 1995 and 2001, copies of which are available at www.irishstatutebook.ie. The Contracting Authority will, at its absolute discretion, decide on the appropriate course of action, which may in appropriate circumstances include eliminating a Tenderer from this Competition or terminating any Services Contract entered into by a Tenderer.
- [Amended - LI2627C - RFT -Reading List Software_Maynooth University.docx] copies of which are available at www.irishstatutebook.ie. The Contracting Authority will, at its absolute discretion, decide on the appropriate course of action, which may in appropriate circumstances include eliminating a Tenderer from this Competition or terminating any Services Contract entered into by a Tenderer.
- Any conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest on the part of a Tenderer, Subcontractor or individual employee(s) or agent(s) of a Tenderer or Subcontractor(s) must be fully disclosed to the Contracting Authority as soon as the conflict or potential conflict is or becomes apparent. In the event of any actual or potential conflict of interest, the Contracting Authority may invite Tenderers to propose means by which the conflict of interest might be removed. The Contracting Authority will, at its absolute discretion, decide on the appropriate course of action, which may in appropriate circumstances include eliminating a Tenderer from this Competition or terminating any Services Contract entered into by a Tenderer.
- 3.2.C Where the Tenderer is unable, for a valid reason, to provide the documentation required under the Accreditation Criterion, the Tenderer must inform the contracting authority of that valid reason and provide such other suitable alternative documentation to prove, to the satisfaction of the contracting authority, their ability to provide the proposed solution for the duration of the Services Contract. Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.
3. Background & buyer context
The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.
- Those selected to attend the Verification Meeting will be invited by the Evaluation team to present their tender submissions, as well as a Q&A session based directly upon your tender response to allow the Evaluation team to truly get the sense of the company’s proposed strategy, direction and experience. The proposed date for Verification Meeting will be advised through eTenders after the competition close date. All costs and expenses incurred by Tenderers
- [Amended - LI2627C - RFT -Reading List Software_Maynooth University.docx] well as a Q&A session based directly upon your tender response to allow the Evaluation team to truly get the sense of the company’s proposed strategy, direction and experience. The proposed date for Verification Meeting will be advised through eTenders after the competition close date. All costs and expenses incurred by Tenderers relating to their participation in this presentation shall be borne by and are a matter for discharge by the Tenderers exclusively.
- 1.7 Contracting Authority policy seeks to encourage participation on a fair and equal basis by Small and Medium Enterprises (“SME”s) in this Competition. SMEs that believe the scope of this Competition is beyond their technical or business capacity are encouraged, subject to paragraph 2.5, to explore the possibilities of forming relationships with other SMEs or with larger enterprises. Through such relationships they can participate and contribute to the successful implementation of any Services Contract that may result from this Competition and therefore increase their social and economic benefits.
4. Eligibility & selection criteria
- Turnover requirement — not specified for this tender
- Insurance — not specified for this tender
- Certifications — not specified for this tender
- Past experience — not specified for this tender
- Personnel — not specified for this tender
- Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender
5. Award criteria & scoring
| Criterion | Weight (%) | Sub-criteria | Pass/fail threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenderers must achieve a minimum of 60% on all tender award criteria above, excl | 60% | not stated | not stated |
| The tender award criteria will be applied to each tender who has successfully pa | 60% | not stated | not stated |
| The documents indicated a staged process (qualification, then tender). Any explicit MEAT split is captured above where a numeric line was visible; otherwise it remained not specified in the provided text extract. |
6. Submission requirements
- Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — Appendix 1 questionnaire/PQQ response was required.
- CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
- Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
- Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
- Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
- Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
- Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
- Value: not disclosed (eTenders placeholder)
- Each Tenderer is required to accept the provisions of this RFT. ALL TENDERERS MUST RETURN, with their Tender, a scanned signed copy of the Tenderer’s Statement, as set out in Appendix 3, printed on the Tenderer’s letterhead. The Contracting Authority must be able to read the scanned signature of the Tenderer. If possible, please sign documents using blue ink. If the Contracting Authority cannot read the scanned signature, Tenderers may be requested to re-submit. Tenderers may not amend the Tenderer’s Statement.
- Where a group of undertakings (in whatever form and regardless of the legal relationship between them) come together to submit a Tender in response to this RFT, the Contracting Authority will deal with all matters relating to this Competition through a single nominated entity authorised to represent all members of the group of undertakings. The Tenderer must provide details of all members of the group of undertakings and their role in the Tender and clearly set out the contact details including name, title, telephone number, postal address, facsimile number and e-mail address of the nominated entity authorised to represent the Tenderer and to whom all communications shall be directed and accepted until this Competition has been completed or terminated. Correspondence from any other person will NOT be accepted, acknowledged or responded to.
- Tenderers are required to notify the Contracting Authority immediately via the e-tenders website, if at any stage they decide to withdraw from this Competition.
- 3.2.E Tenderers relying on the paragraph 3.2 capacities of other entities MUST submit with their Tender an undertaking, duly evidenced, from those entities that they will place the necessary resources at the disposal of the Tenderer.
- A failure to answer question(s) may leave the contracting authority with insufficient information on which to base a thorough evaluation and in turn may result in loss of marks in respect of the relevant Award Criterion. Therefore, please ensure you complete ALL sections of this questionnaire.
7. Key dates & process
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| RFT issued | not specified |
| Clarification deadline | not specified |
| Mandatory site visit | not specified |
| Tender deadline (date + time) | 2023-11-21T14:00:00+00:00 |
| Expected award | not specified |
| Contract start | not specified |
| Go-live / mobilisation | not stated |
| Date surfaced in documents | 2023-11-21T14:00:00+00:00 |
| Date surfaced in documents | Acts 1995 |
| Date surfaced in documents | Act 2002 |
| Date surfaced in documents | The 2002 |
8. Contract terms that matter
Contract duration in the extract: 12 months. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.
- VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
- In line with current legislation where a company has an annual turnover of less than €12 Million then audited accounts are not necessary
- , ISO27001, PCS-DSS, SOC2, HIPAA, etc
- [insert number]calendar days either Party may terminate at 14 days’ notice
- breach(es) (if the breach(es) are capable of remedy) within 30 days after receipt of a request in writing f
- For the Term and for a period of 12 months thereafter (and save in respect of publ
- e right to extend the Term for a period or periods of up to 12 months with a maximum of one such extension pe
- Where a group of undertakings (in whatever form and regardless of the legal relationship between them) come together to submit a Tender in response to this RFT, the Contracting Authority will deal with all matters relating to this Competition through a single nominated entity authorised to represent all members of the group of undertakings. The Tenderer must provide details of all members of the group of undertakings and their role in the Tender and clearly set out the contact details including name, title, telephone number, postal address, facsimile number and e-mail address of the nominated entity authorised to represent the Tenderer and to whom all communications shall be directed and accepted until this Competition has been completed or terminated. Correspondence from any other person will NOT be accepted, acknowledged or responded to.
9. Risks, red flags & unusuals
- Numeric qualification gates were only partially visible, so eligibility certainty required full pack review.
- Contract value was not disclosed in metadata, creating uncertainty on margin, resourcing, and financing assumptions.
- The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
- Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.
10. SME fit assessment
This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.
- Credible bidder profile — specialist operator with compliant procurement governance and evidencable experience.
- Consortium / sub-contracting — allowed or addressed in the extracts (Appendix references and reliance provisions).
- Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
- Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.
11. Where to dig deeper
- Source RFT/PQQ filenames: Amended - LI2627C - RFT -Reading List Software_Maynooth University.docx, RFT for the Provision of a Reading List Software/Resource List Management System, RFT -Reading List Software_Maynooth University.docx] LI2627C.
- eTenders CFT / notice reference: not specified in extract.
- Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
- Key attachments to prioritise: RFT Requirements, RFT. ALL TENDERERS MUST RETURN, with their Tender, a scanned signed copy of the Ten, Appendix 3, printed on the Tenderer’s letterhead. The Contracting Authority must be able.
This tender has been awarded
- Ex Libris UK (Ltd)
- Ex Libris UK (Ltd) · 11 Apr 2024
- GeoAerospace · 07 Apr 2021
Can you bid?
Required certifications
- ISO 9001
- Data Protection Certification
Minimum turnover
€12,000,000
Scoring
Most Economically Advantageous Tender
Documents (5)
LI2627C - Appendix 1 Technical Specification.docx
119.9 KB · Specification
Amended - LI2627C - RFT -Reading List Software_Maynooth University.docx
196.0 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender
LI2627C - RFT -Reading List Software_Maynooth University.docx
195.9 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender
LI2627C - Appendix 2 - Pricing Schedule.xlsx
71.0 KB · Pricing / BOQ / Schedule of Rates
espdRequest-2625401.pdf
69.7 KB · ESPD (European Single Procurement Document)
Original notice text
This tender seeks a provider for a Reading List Software/Resource List Management System for Maynooth University, focusing on implementation and ongoing service delivery.
AI analysis updated 4 months ago
Deadline
21 Nov
Location
Maynooth University
Procedure
Open
Clarification
14 Nov 2023
eTenders ID
2625401
Ask AI
Knows this tender's documents
Example only — sign up to ask about this tender