1949 Roof Works to St. Manchan's NS, Tubber

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

2. Scope of Work

St. Manchan's National School (Tubber) ran this procurement for “1949 Roof Works to St. Manchan's NS, Tubber” as an operational contract requiring implementation and sustained service execution. The extracted pack showed qualification-stage material with references to later ITT technical depth; practical activity therefore centred on building, integrating, and operating the specified service stack with compliant reporting and handover obligations where stated. Constituent activities and named work elements in the supplied extracts:

• 4 Location of Existing Services – water, electrici
• 1 As a result of the introduction of the new electronic Relevant Contracts tax (e-RCT) system by the
• existing services or working hours, statutory consents and conditions attached thereto.
• not construction operations subject to Relevant Contracts Tax (and therefore Non-binding monetary references in the source were treated as context only and were not used as qualification thresholds.

3. Background & buyer context

The buyer context reflected a formal Irish public-procurement route, with pre-qualification used to control entry into the tender stage.

• 4 Location of Existing Services – water, electrici
• Works will consist of the refurbishment of existing roof areas to be re
• existing services or working hours, statutory consents and conditions attached thereto.
• refundable to all tenderers that submit bona fide tenders that are not

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

• Turnover requirement — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• Insurance — — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.; ) Minimum indemnity limit for employer’s liability insurance €13,000,000 for any one event 10; 4 Maximum levels of excess for  insurance of the Works and goods and materials for the Works €4,000  public liability (property damage) €6,5009  public liability (death, illness or injury) no excess  employer’s liability €6,50010 12
• Certifications — not specified for this tender
• Past experience — not specified for this tender
• Personnel — not specified for this tender
• Geographic / facility constraints — not specified for this tender Additional binding lines surfaced in the deterministic extract:
• — use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.
• ) Minimum indemnity limit for employer’s liability insurance €13,000,000 for any one event 10
• 4 Maximum levels of excess for  insurance of the Works and goods and materials for the Works €4,000  public liability (property damage) €6,5009  public liability (death, illness or injury) no excess  employer’s liability €6,50010 12
• 3g Public Liability Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance I declare that the above named Contractor has, or (if successful in this tender competition) will take out (prior to appointment), Public Liability Insurance (with a minimum level of cover of €6,500,000) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (w
• ith a minimum level of cover of €13,000,000) in accordance with the conditions stat

5. Award criteria & scoring

6. Submission requirements

• Method statement / response document (template/page limits) — Appendix 1 questionnaire/PQQ response was required.
• CVs (page count, named roles) — not specified in extract.
• Pricing schedule (format/template) — expected at ITT stage.
• Case studies (number/value range) — client references/comparable project evidence was referenced.
• Declarations (ESPD/Bona Fides/Tax/COI) — ESPD/declaration/statement-of-confirmation language was present.
• Mandatory site visit — not specified in extract.
• Submission portal and formatting — eTenders portal and PDF electronic copies were referenced. Submission-related source lines:
• Value: not disclosed (eTenders placeholder)
• with a value of less than €250,000. Projects in excess of €50,000 must be advertised on etenders
• [1949.Tubber NS.ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf] Instruction to Tenderers
• [1949.Tubber NS.ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf] . The Employer has not authorised anyone
• [1949.Tubber NS.ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf] documents are being made available on the terms stated in these
• [1949.Tubber NS.ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf] Tenderer’s Tender), the

7. Key dates & process

8. Contract terms that matter

Contract duration in the extract: 12 months. Payment cycle, SLA/KPI schedule, and penalty regime were not fully disclosed in the snippets unless listed below.

• VERIFIED PHRASES (deterministic regex extract from the documents — treat as authoritative for numerical claims)
• ory application, we expect that a bond can be issued within 4 weeks of the receipt by us of the relevant ap
• (b) expiry of at least 21 days written notice to terminate this Tender
• or any part of it and may terminate the process or any part of it at any time,
• These documents are being made available on the terms stated in these
• use of these documents contrary to any law is prohibited. Recipients must
• [1949.Tubber NS.ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf] documents are being made available on the terms stated in these
• Recipients of these Instructions to Tenderers must treat these documents,

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

• Qualification gate: the deterministic extract included a turnover threshold line (— use these verbatim for insurance / turnover. If a category (insurance, turnover) has no entry here, treat it as 'not specified' for THIS tender.), which can materially narrow bidder pool composition.
• Contract value was not disclosed in metadata, creating uncertainty on margin, resourcing, and financing assumptions.
• The two-step process (PQQ then ITT) shifted effort to compliance evidence early, with competitive scoring detail potentially deferred.
• Technical and contractual granularity appeared ITT-dependent, increasing ambiguity at qualification stage for non-incumbent bidders.

10. SME fit assessment

This competition looked most accessible to firms with established public-sector tender capability, documented financial capacity, and direct operational experience in the relevant service category.

• Credible bidder profile — mid-sized to large specialist with formal QA/compliance process.
• Consortium / sub-contracting — not clearly specified in extract.
• Indicative bid-prep effort — 6 to 12 working days for evidence collation, form completion, and review cycles at PQQ level.
• Pwin signal — strongest for bidders with reusable qualification artefacts, comparable references, and low-friction mobilisation capability.

11. Where to dig deeper

• Source RFT/PQQ filenames: 1949.Tubber NS.ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf, ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf] Instruction to Tenderers, ITTW4 v1.3 07/01/2022.
• eTenders CFT / notice reference: contract notice for the Works to etenders.2.
• Clarification contact / portal: eTenders message portal (email not surfaced in extract).
• Key attachments to prioritise: ITT-W4 v1.3, ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf] . The Employer has not authorised anyone, ITT-W4-v1.3-07-01-2022.pdf] documents are being made available on the terms stated.