Skip to content
TenderMatch
The recorded submission deadline has passed. Find open opportunities. Check the official notice for amendments.
← Tenders / Offaly DVR - Design Team Services for New Domestic Violence Refuge
Closed Professional Consultancy Services Open

Offaly DVR - Design Team Services for New Domestic Violence Refuge

Deadline

11 Jun

Design team services for a new domestic violence refuge in Tullamore, Offaly.

SME fit: High Bid effort: Medium 📍 Offaly

Design team services for a new domestic violence refuge in Tullamore, Offaly.

Bidder profile

This opportunity is suitable for SMEs with experience in social service projects and strong compliance capabilities.

Risks & flags

  • Strict compliance requirements
  • Tight submission deadlines
  • Insurance thresholds

Briefing

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

Field Detail
Buyer Oaklee Housing
Title Offaly DVR - Design Team Services to Oversee the delivery of a New Domestic Violence Refuge on Kearney's Drive, Tullamore Town, Co. Offaly.
CPV / category Professional Consultancy
Estimated value not disclosed (eTenders placeholder)
Per-year (if multi-year) not stated
Procedure type not stated
Lots not stated
Location not stated
Contract length not stated
Submission deadline 2026-05-14T15:00:00+00:00
Go-live / start not stated

2. Scope of Work

The contracting authority sought professional consultancy under the title "Offaly DVR - Design Team Services to Oversee the delivery of a New Domestic Violence Refuge on Kearney's Drive, Tullamore Town, Co. Offaly." for Oaklee Housing. The extracted text pointed to a defined scope with mandatory obligations, programme interfaces, and compliance-led execution constraints. Operational activity included mobilisation, method planning, delivery sequencing, quality control, and handover obligations tied to contract conditions. The source wording repeatedly used mandatory language, which indicated that bidders had to evidence capability rather than provide high-level intent. Key quantified references in the extract included € 1,250,000, € 1,500,000, 2%, €5,000,, € 2600000, € 10,000, € 13,000,000, € 6,500,000.

(i) Level of cover and excess as stated below for the Principal Service Provider: Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Cover on Each and Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis € 1,250,000[11] € 1,500,000[12] Maximum level o. Level of cover and excess as stated below for Specialist Skill Providers; Minimum level of Professional Indem Service Provider will bear the cost: 2% of turnover or €5,000, whichever is greatest 1. Level of cover and excess as stated below for Specialist Skill Providers; Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Specialist Skill Provider Cover on Each and Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis Architect € 1,250,000 € 1,500,000 Assigned Certifier € 1,250,000 €. Minimum level of Public Liability Insurance required in respect of any one accident: € 2600000[13] Maximum level of excess for property only* for any one incident below which the Service Providerwill bear the cost: € 10,000 * No excess is permitted in respec. Entitles issuing public liability insurance cover must have been granted an authorisation as an insurance undertaking by the Central Bank of Ireland to provide below which the Service Providerwill bear the cost: € 10,000 * No excess is permitted in respec. Minimum level of Employer’s Liability Insurance required in respect of any one accident: € 13,000,000[14] Entitles issuing.

3. Background & buyer context

The process was run by Oaklee Housing with deadline recorded as 2026-05-14T15:00:00+00:00. Procedure details were stated as not stated and lot structure as not stated. Contract period was stated as not stated with start/go-live marked not stated. The timeline required bidders to align submission content, evidence packs, and declarations to strict procurement sequencing. Any missing dates in extracts should be treated as pending clarification rather than optional.

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

Selection evidence focused on technical capacity, legal standing, and economic/financial sufficiency against mandatory thresholds. Insurance and indemnity references appeared in the verified text and should be treated as compliance gates at selection stage. Bid teams should map each mandatory phrase to objective evidence in the response index. Examples in extract included: (i) Level of cover and excess as stated below for the Principal Service Provider: Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Cover on Each and Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis € 1,250,000[11] € 1,500,000[12] Maximum level o; Level of cover and excess as stated below for Specialist Skill Providers; Minimum level of Professional Indem Service Provider will bear the cost: 2% of turnover or €5,000, whichever is greatest 1; Level of cover and excess as stated below for Specialist Skill Providers; Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Specialist Skill Provider Cover on Each and Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis Architect € 1,250,000 € 1,500,000 Assigned Certifier € 1,250,000 €; Minimum level of Public Liability Insurance required in respect of any one accident: € 2600000[13] Maximum level of excess for property only* for any one incident below which the Service Providerwill bear the cost: € 10,000 * No excess is permitted in respec; Entitles issuing public liability insurance cover must have been granted an authorisation as an insurance undertaking by the Central Bank of Ireland to provide below which the Service Providerwill bear the cost: € 10,000 * No excess is permitted in respec. Any criterion stated with must/shall language should be assumed pass/fail unless the RFT explicitly describes scored treatment.

5. Award criteria & scoring

Evaluation was expected to follow MEAT-style scoring with weighted quality and price components unless otherwise stated in tender schedules. Quality marks typically depended on method, risk control, programme realism, governance, and relevant delivery track record. Price submission needed arithmetic consistency with bill/rate schedules and full compliance with format instructions. Clarification risk increased where responses omitted direct mapping from requirement text to evidence. Bidders should prioritise score-driving narratives only where criteria confirmed comparative marking.

6. Submission requirements

Delivery model expectations in the extracted material pointed to planned mobilisation, controlled execution, and measurable acceptance milestones. Outputs had to match specification wording, drawings/schedules where applicable, and authority approval checkpoints. Programme control, interface management, and issue escalation routes should be explicit in the bidder methodology. Acceptance should be evidenced through inspection records, compliance certificates, and closeout documentation as required by contract documents. Any dependency on third parties, utilities, or permits should be shown as dated assumptions with mitigation pathways.

7. Key dates & process

Commercial baseline in metadata showed estimated value not disclosed (eTenders placeholder). Pricing mechanics in public tenders usually required fixed-format submissions, exclusions discipline, and tax clarity. Bidders should validate indexation, provisional sums, option pricing, and variation treatment before final submission. Cashflow profile, milestone triggers, and retention/security positions should be checked against conditions and appendices. Where value fields were absent or symbolic, competition strategy should be based on scope intensity and risk transfer level.

8. Contract terms that matter

Legal and risk obligations in the extract referenced indemnity/insurance language and operational compliance obligations. Core controls should include H&S compliance, statutory licensing, data/security duties where relevant, and records retention. Contractual risk allocation likely covered delay, defects, liability caps/exclusions, and termination events; these need legal review. Quoted risk-relevant references included (i) Level of cover and excess as stated below for the Principal Service Provider: Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Cover on Each and Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis € 1,250,000[11] € 1,500,000[12] Maximum level o; Level of cover and excess as stated below for Specialist Skill Providers; Minimum level of Professional Indem Service Provider will bear the cost: 2% of turnover or €5,000, whichever is greatest 1; Level of cover and excess as stated below for Specialist Skill Providers; Minimum level of Professional Indemnity Insurance complying with the conditions below: Specialist Skill Provider Cover on Each and Every claim basis Cover on an Annual Aggregate basis Architect € 1,250,000 € 1,500,000 Assigned Certifier € 1,250,000 €; Minimum level of Public Liability Insurance required in respect of any one accident: € 2600000[13] Maximum level of excess for property only* for any one incident below which the Service Providerwill bear the cost: € 10,000 * No excess is permitted in respec; Entitles issuing public liability insurance cover must have been granted an authorisation as an insurance undertaking by the Central Bank of Ireland to provide below which the Service Providerwill bear the cost: € 10,000 * No excess is permitted in respec; Minimum level of Employer’s Liability Insurance required in respect of any one accident: € 13,000,000[14] Entitles issuing. No submission should proceed with unresolved redlines on non-negotiable risk positions.

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

Process discipline should center on portal deadlines, clarification cut-off control, and version-managed response packs. Clarification questions should target missing thresholds, ambiguous acceptance tests, and any conflicting schedule references. A compliant submission pack usually includes signed forms, declarations, technical method statements, pricing schedules, and insurances. With deadline at 2026-05-14T15:00:00+00:00, internal freeze points should be set before portal close to absorb upload and validation risk. Any post-submission communication should follow the authority channel rules exactly.

10. SME fit assessment

  1. Build a requirement-by-requirement compliance matrix from the RFT and map each row to objective evidence.
  2. Confirm all pass/fail gates first (legal entity, insurances, financial standing, declarations, mandatory forms).
  3. Lock technical method narrative to the scored criteria language and remove non-scoring text.
  4. Reconcile pricing schedules, totals, assumptions, and signatures across every commercial form.
  5. Submit early on the portal and retain timestamped proof of upload and final file set.

11. Where to dig deeper

This opportunity suited a delivery-capable SME or lower-mid-market contractor with strong compliance execution and disciplined bid management. Bid/no-bid should turn on pass/fail certainty, resource availability to mobilise on authority timescales, and acceptable contractual risk. If mandatory insurance/financial thresholds cannot be met directly, consortium or structured subcontracting options should be evaluated before committing bid cost. For firms already active in comparable Irish public contracts, this looked like a viable competitive pursuit with tight execution discipline. Tender reference: 778de1d5-a66c-4c7b-9493-fb998db5b1e5.

Can you bid?

Required certifications

  • ISO 9001
  • Safe-T-Cert

Public liability insurance

€2,600,000

Professional indemnity insurance

€1,250,000

Scoring

Most Economically Advantageous Tender

Documents (33)

DOCX

_Instruction to Tender (ITT_S2b__v2.0-04-11-2024) (%based fee).docx

98.1 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

DOCX

_Instruction to Tender (ITT_S2b__v2.0-04-11-2024).docx

97.6 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

PDF

Description of Service 2502-00-X-000-XXX-RP-HA-AR-9200.pdf

2.7 MB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

DOCX

_Tender & Pricing Document - DT (%based fee).docx

475.8 KB · Pricing / BOQ / Schedule of Rates

DOCX

_Tender & Pricing Document - DT.docx

475.5 KB · Pricing / BOQ / Schedule of Rates

DOCX

_COE-1-v2.j-30-09-2024.docx

90.7 KB · Contract / Agreement / Terms

DOCX

_MF-2.3-v1.2-14-10-2024.docx

56.4 KB · Contract / Agreement / Terms

ZIP

02_Model Forms.zip

333.2 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

_Appendix_A_Applicants_Self-Declaration__Regulation_57.docx

44.2 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

_Appendix_B3_Certificate_of_Satisfactory_Delivery_of_Services.docx

29.1 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

_MF-2.4 H&S Compliance 16-07-2013.docx

30.9 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

_MF-2.7-09-02-2022.docx

41.2 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

_MF-2.8-09-02-2022 (1).docx

34.3 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

DOCX

_MF_2.5_v1.1-25-11-2025.docx

34.8 KB · Form / Declaration / Certificate

PDF

2305-OCC-PRE-00-DR-A-002-R00-Existing Site Survey.pdf

800.8 KB · Drawing / Plan / Layout

ZIP

01_SAQ.zip

378.6 KB · Other

ZIP

03_Additional Information.zip

5.7 MB · Other

ZIP

04 Tender Documents.zip

361.3 KB · Other

PDF

20251128 - Tullamore DVR Capital Appraisal.pdf

4.2 MB · Other

PDF

CA25000118 DV Refuge- Kearney's Drive Tullamore- Stage 1 Approval.pdf

1.1 MB · Other

PDF

PCE-Uisce Eireann.pdf

332.8 KB · Other

DOCX

_Appendix D1 CV Template.docx

55.6 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

_Appendix-A1-QC2.docx

31.9 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

_Appendix-B1-QC1-and-QC2-09-02-2022.docx

26.9 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

_Appendix-C-QC1-and-QC2-09-02-2022.docx

35.0 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

_Appendix-D-QC1-and-QC2-09-02-2022.docx

33.7 KB · Appendix / Annex

PDF

_Instruction to Tender (ITT_S2b__v2.0-04-11-2024) (Addendum).pdf

1.3 MB · Clarification / Addendum

DOCX

_MF-2.1-09-02-2022.docx

53.7 KB · Insurance / Indemnity

DOCX

_SAQ QC2-Part-1_v3.2-25-11-2025.docx

161.4 KB · ESPD (European Single Procurement Document)

DOCX

_SAQ QC_Part_2_v1.1_04-11-2024.docx

67.5 KB · ESPD (European Single Procurement Document)

DOCX

_Tender & Schedule DT (FTS9_v1.10_16-09-2024) (%based fee).docx

272.9 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

_Tender & Schedule DT (FTS9_v1.10_16-09-2024).docx

199.7 KB · Appendix / Annex

ZIP

Addendum 2 - Change to Percentage-Based Fee.zip

408.9 KB · Clarification / Addendum

Original notice text

Consultancy Appointment of: Lead Consultant, Architectural, Structural and Civil Engineering, Building Services Engineering, Quantity Surveying, Fire Consultancy, Disability Access Consultancy, Project Supervisor Design Process, Design and Assigned Certifiers and Employer’s Representative Services.

AI analysis updated 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Bid ↗
Details

Deadline

11 Jun

View on eTenders ↗

Location

Kearney's Drive, Tullamore Town, Co. Offaly.

Procedure

Open

Clarification

14 May 2026

eTenders ID

7880988

✦ Ask AI about this tender

Ask AI

Knows this tender's documents

Is this a good fit for us?
Based on the deadline, buyer, and eligibility requirements in the tender documents, here's a quick read on fit — with citations back to the exact clause 1 so you can verify it yourself.

Example only — sign up to ask about this tender