Skip to content
TenderMatch
The recorded submission deadline has passed. Find open opportunities. Check the official notice for amendments.
← Tenders / AC-2026-5 Provision of baseline mapping the art and technology sector across the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland
Closed Research & Data Analytics Services Open

AC-2026-5 Provision of baseline mapping the art and technology sector across the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Value

€24k

Deadline

19 May

Research and data analytics for mapping the art and technology sector in Ireland and Northern Ireland

SME fit: High Bid effort: Medium

Research and data analytics for mapping the art and technology sector in Ireland and Northern Ireland

Bidder profile

This opportunity is suitable for SMEs with expertise in research and data analytics, particularly in the arts and technology sectors.

Risks & flags

  • Compliance requirements
  • Insurance thresholds
  • Submission deadlines

Briefing

AI-generated analysis of the documents. Check the official notice and any amendments for current submission details.

1. At a glance

Field Detail
Buyer The Arts Council
Title AC-2026-5 Provision of baseline mapping the art and technology sector across the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland
CPV / category Research & Data Analytics
Estimated value €24,000.00
Per-year (if multi-year) not stated
Procedure type not stated
Lots not stated
Location not stated
Contract length not stated
Submission deadline 2026-05-19T13:00:00+00:00
Go-live / start not stated

2. Scope of Work

The contracting authority sought research & data analytics under the title "AC-2026-5 Provision of baseline mapping the art and technology sector across the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland" for The Arts Council. The extracted text pointed to a defined scope with mandatory obligations, programme interfaces, and compliance-led execution constraints. Operational activity included mobilisation, method planning, delivery sequencing, quality control, and handover obligations tied to contract conditions. The source wording repeatedly used mandatory language, which indicated that bidders had to evidence capability rather than provide high-level intent. Key quantified references in the extract included €1,000,000, €13,000,000, €6,500,000, €1,500,000, €500,000, €24,000.

The Consultant shall take out and maintain professional indemnity cover in respect of the Services provided by the Consultant for a sum not less than €1,000,000 each and every claim covering claims for. Such insurance shall be in a form and with insurers approved by the Authority and shall be maintained for a period of professional indemnity cover in respect of the Services provided by the Consultant for a sum not less than €1,000,000 each and every claim covering claims for. The Consultant shall procure and maintain employer’s liability insurance, if applicable, covering any liability, loss, claim or proceedings in respect of any injury to or disease contracted by or death of any person in the employment of the Consultant up to a limit of €13,000,000 in respect of any one claim or series of. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Insurance requirements Indemnity Limit H1 Employer’s Liability Insurance Not required where the Tenderer is self-employed €13,000,000 H2 Public Liability Insurance Where s. Ervices are provided virtually or the contract is for product supply only, Public Liability Insurance will not be a requirement €6,500,000 H3 Professional Indemnity Insurance €1,500,000 H4 Cyber Security Indemnity Insurance €500,000 10 I. CONDITIONS PRI supply only, Public Liability Insurance will not be a requirement €6,500,000 H3 Professional Indemnity Insurance €1,500,000 H4 Cyber Security Indemnity Insurance €500,000 10 I.

3. Background & buyer context

The process was run by The Arts Council with deadline recorded as 2026-05-19T13:00:00+00:00. Procedure details were stated as not stated and lot structure as not stated. Contract period was stated as not stated with start/go-live marked not stated. The timeline required bidders to align submission content, evidence packs, and declarations to strict procurement sequencing. Any missing dates in extracts should be treated as pending clarification rather than optional.

4. Eligibility & selection criteria

Selection evidence focused on technical capacity, legal standing, and economic/financial sufficiency against mandatory thresholds. Insurance and indemnity references appeared in the verified text and should be treated as compliance gates at selection stage. Bid teams should map each mandatory phrase to objective evidence in the response index. Examples in extract included: The Consultant shall take out and maintain professional indemnity cover in respect of the Services provided by the Consultant for a sum not less than €1,000,000 each and every claim covering claims for; Such insurance shall be in a form and with insurers approved by the Authority and shall be maintained for a period of professional indemnity cover in respect of the Services provided by the Consultant for a sum not less than €1,000,000 each and every claim covering claims for; The Consultant shall procure and maintain employer’s liability insurance, if applicable, covering any liability, loss, claim or proceedings in respect of any injury to or disease contracted by or death of any person in the employment of the Consultant up to a limit of €13,000,000 in respect of any one claim or series of; INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Insurance requirements Indemnity Limit H1 Employer’s Liability Insurance Not required where the Tenderer is self-employed €13,000,000 H2 Public Liability Insurance Where s; ervices are provided virtually or the contract is for product supply only, Public Liability Insurance will not be a requirement €6,500,000 H3 Professional Indemnity Insurance €1,500,000 H4 Cyber Security Indemnity Insurance €500,000 10 I. Any criterion stated with must/shall language should be assumed pass/fail unless the RFT explicitly describes scored treatment.

5. Award criteria & scoring

Evaluation was expected to follow MEAT-style scoring with weighted quality and price components unless otherwise stated in tender schedules. Quality marks typically depended on method, risk control, programme realism, governance, and relevant delivery track record. Price submission needed arithmetic consistency with bill/rate schedules and full compliance with format instructions. Clarification risk increased where responses omitted direct mapping from requirement text to evidence. Bidders should prioritise score-driving narratives only where criteria confirmed comparative marking.

6. Submission requirements

Delivery model expectations in the extracted material pointed to planned mobilisation, controlled execution, and measurable acceptance milestones. Outputs had to match specification wording, drawings/schedules where applicable, and authority approval checkpoints. Programme control, interface management, and issue escalation routes should be explicit in the bidder methodology. Acceptance should be evidenced through inspection records, compliance certificates, and closeout documentation as required by contract documents. Any dependency on third parties, utilities, or permits should be shown as dated assumptions with mitigation pathways.

7. Key dates & process

Commercial baseline in metadata showed estimated value €24,000.00. Pricing mechanics in public tenders usually required fixed-format submissions, exclusions discipline, and tax clarity. Bidders should validate indexation, provisional sums, option pricing, and variation treatment before final submission. Cashflow profile, milestone triggers, and retention/security positions should be checked against conditions and appendices. Where value fields were absent or symbolic, competition strategy should be based on scope intensity and risk transfer level.

8. Contract terms that matter

Legal and risk obligations in the extract referenced indemnity/insurance language and operational compliance obligations. Core controls should include H&S compliance, statutory licensing, data/security duties where relevant, and records retention. Contractual risk allocation likely covered delay, defects, liability caps/exclusions, and termination events; these need legal review. Quoted risk-relevant references included The Consultant shall take out and maintain professional indemnity cover in respect of the Services provided by the Consultant for a sum not less than €1,000,000 each and every claim covering claims for; Such insurance shall be in a form and with insurers approved by the Authority and shall be maintained for a period of professional indemnity cover in respect of the Services provided by the Consultant for a sum not less than €1,000,000 each and every claim covering claims for; The Consultant shall procure and maintain employer’s liability insurance, if applicable, covering any liability, loss, claim or proceedings in respect of any injury to or disease contracted by or death of any person in the employment of the Consultant up to a limit of €13,000,000 in respect of any one claim or series of; INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Insurance requirements Indemnity Limit H1 Employer’s Liability Insurance Not required where the Tenderer is self-employed €13,000,000 H2 Public Liability Insurance Where s; ervices are provided virtually or the contract is for product supply only, Public Liability Insurance will not be a requirement €6,500,000 H3 Professional Indemnity Insurance €1,500,000 H4 Cyber Security Indemnity Insurance €500,000 10 I; CONDITIONS PRI supply only, Public Liability Insurance will not be a requirement €6,500,000 H3 Professional Indemnity Insurance €1,500,000 H4 Cyber Security Indemnity Insurance €500,000 10 I. No submission should proceed with unresolved redlines on non-negotiable risk positions.

9. Risks, red flags & unusuals

Process discipline should center on portal deadlines, clarification cut-off control, and version-managed response packs. Clarification questions should target missing thresholds, ambiguous acceptance tests, and any conflicting schedule references. A compliant submission pack usually includes signed forms, declarations, technical method statements, pricing schedules, and insurances. With deadline at 2026-05-19T13:00:00+00:00, internal freeze points should be set before portal close to absorb upload and validation risk. Any post-submission communication should follow the authority channel rules exactly.

10. SME fit assessment

  1. Build a requirement-by-requirement compliance matrix from the RFT and map each row to objective evidence.
  2. Confirm all pass/fail gates first (legal entity, insurances, financial standing, declarations, mandatory forms).
  3. Lock technical method narrative to the scored criteria language and remove non-scoring text.
  4. Reconcile pricing schedules, totals, assumptions, and signatures across every commercial form.
  5. Submit early on the portal and retain timestamped proof of upload and final file set.

11. Where to dig deeper

This opportunity suited a delivery-capable SME or lower-mid-market contractor with strong compliance execution and disciplined bid management. Bid/no-bid should turn on pass/fail certainty, resource availability to mobilise on authority timescales, and acceptable contractual risk. If mandatory insurance/financial thresholds cannot be met directly, consortium or structured subcontracting options should be evaluated before committing bid cost. For firms already active in comparable Irish public contracts, this looked like a viable competitive pursuit with tight execution discipline. Tender reference: b8d98de3-9f72-4d95-9ffb-0309015da59d.

Can you bid?

Public liability insurance

€6,500,000

Professional indemnity insurance

€1,000,000

Scoring

Most Economically Advantageous Tender

Documents (7)

PDF

1. AC-2026-05 CFT Baseline Digital Arts Mapping v1.1.pdf

502.8 KB · RFT / Invitation to Tender

DOCX

3. AC-2026-05 Appendix 2 Specimen Contract.docx

93.7 KB · Contract / Agreement / Terms

DOCX

4. AC-2026-05 Appendix 3 Specimen Data Protection Agreement.docx

68.3 KB · Contract / Agreement / Terms

DOCX

2. AC-2026-05 TRD Baseline Digital Arts Mapping.docx

89.7 KB · Tender Response Template

DOCX

5. AC-2026-05 Appendix 4 Specimen Data Protection Assessment.docx

62.9 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

6. AC-2026-05 Appendix 5 Specimen 3rd Party Supplier Information Security Assessment.docx

59.5 KB · Appendix / Annex

DOCX

7. AC-2026-05 Appendix 6 - Spesimen 3rd Party DPO Infosec.docx

29.5 KB · Appendix / Annex

Original notice text

The Arts Council Ireland (ACI) and the Arts Council of Northern Ireland (ACNI) are jointly procuring a service provider to undertake a baseline mapping of the art and technology sector across the island of Ireland (Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland). The purpose of this contract is to produce an evidence-based, high-level overview of the art and technology ecosystem that will inform future policy development, funding decisions, and potential further research or investment programmes by both Arts Councils. Full details are provided in the CFT document.

AI analysis updated 2 months, 2 weeks ago

Bid ↗
Details

Value

€24k

Deadline

19 May

View on eTenders ↗

Procedure

Open

Clarification

19 May 2026

eTenders ID

7994427

✦ Ask AI about this tender

Ask AI

Knows this tender's documents

Is this a good fit for us?
Based on the deadline, buyer, and eligibility requirements in the tender documents, here's a quick read on fit — with citations back to the exact clause 1 so you can verify it yourself.

Example only — sign up to ask about this tender